<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Finally in Rebuilding Your Credit</title>
    <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228553#M1315</link>
    <description>&lt;div&gt;Finally, have all of my cr, after only having eq for about 2 weeks I broke down and bought the other two not bad, eq 695, tu 688, and ex 708. I really found quite a few discrepancies between some of them. Found out I have a Macy's account w/ a $1000 limit that is inactive, but reporting good info for 2 year, think I will request a card and build the tradeline. Also, found this discrepancies, on ex, Citi is reporting a paid c/o but with 24 lates @ 90 days or greater but was only c/o for 2 years. Where does 24 lates @ 90+ come from within 2 year (is this legal?). On the contrary, tu is reporting no lates and a paid co on Citi. Further more eq is reporting one 30 day late and a paid c/o. Should I dispute or GW these 24 lates on a 708, or leave it alone so they don't report lates to tu and eq? Same with a GMAC lease one reports a paid co, another one lates without a charge of, and another with one late and a charge off. Advice? &lt;/div&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rjf78</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-05-03T19:33:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Finally</title>
      <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228553#M1315</link>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;Finally, have all of my cr, after only having eq for about 2 weeks I broke down and bought the other two not bad, eq 695, tu 688, and ex 708. I really found quite a few discrepancies between some of them. Found out I have a Macy's account w/ a $1000 limit that is inactive, but reporting good info for 2 year, think I will request a card and build the tradeline. Also, found this discrepancies, on ex, Citi is reporting a paid c/o but with 24 lates @ 90 days or greater but was only c/o for 2 years. Where does 24 lates @ 90+ come from within 2 year (is this legal?). On the contrary, tu is reporting no lates and a paid co on Citi. Further more eq is reporting one 30 day late and a paid c/o. Should I dispute or GW these 24 lates on a 708, or leave it alone so they don't report lates to tu and eq? Same with a GMAC lease one reports a paid co, another one lates without a charge of, and another with one late and a charge off. Advice? &lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:33:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228553#M1315</guid>
      <dc:creator>rjf78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-03T19:33:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finally</title>
      <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228646#M1327</link>
      <description>Are you currently a customer in good standing with Citi?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 22:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228646#M1327</guid>
      <dc:creator>TheNewWorldMan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-03T22:09:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Finally</title>
      <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228896#M1394</link>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;No, I am not a current customer of Citi, wish I was maybe easier to gw them.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:46:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Finally/m-p/228896#M1394</guid>
      <dc:creator>rjf78</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-05-04T03:46:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

