<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Real World Example of Util/TL/Baddie v/s Score in Rebuilding Your Credit</title>
    <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Real-World-Example-of-Util-TL-Baddie-v-s-Score/m-p/1568662#M205080</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Been busy with GWs (keeping up the faith in spite of multiple NOs) but as I see frequent questions about util-baddies-TLs v/s score I thought I would provide a 1-month example:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My scores have been steadily increasing 5+/- per month.  I've ensured my util is never over 9% during the entire process.  This month I became busy and waited 3 days too many on my CC payments and BOOM ... the accounts posted to the CRAs with approximately 25% util (not late, mind you ... rather, I simply missed my statement cut dates).  Guess what:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of 1-Aug:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EQ-FICO = 605 with 9% util.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TU-FICO = 558 with 9% util&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of 1-Sept:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EQ-FICO = 598 with 24% util ... a 7 pt drop OH NOE!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TU-FICO = 599 with 24% util ... a 41 pt increase ... YEAH BAYBEEE!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What changed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cap1 began reporting my new CC ($550 CL)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Made my payments *after* my statement cut dates thereby increasing my util from 9% to 24% &amp;lt;face palm&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Had a baddie adjusted on my TU: lates removed ... balance set to $0 ... account closed ... now reporting as &amp;quot;Never Late / Paid As Agreed&amp;quot;   WOOHOO!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Considering the above three factors, a new TL does make a temporary small ding but the increase in TL *can* lower your util and the removal of a single baddie *can* make a huge difference.  My next score pull on 1-Oct, I am hoping, should be quite nice! :)  Ok, I've finished babbling.  These results are mine and YMMV but I would imagine they are typical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ApexdvToo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-09-01T17:18:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Real World Example of Util/TL/Baddie v/s Score</title>
      <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Real-World-Example-of-Util-TL-Baddie-v-s-Score/m-p/1568662#M205080</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi all,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Been busy with GWs (keeping up the faith in spite of multiple NOs) but as I see frequent questions about util-baddies-TLs v/s score I thought I would provide a 1-month example:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My scores have been steadily increasing 5+/- per month.  I've ensured my util is never over 9% during the entire process.  This month I became busy and waited 3 days too many on my CC payments and BOOM ... the accounts posted to the CRAs with approximately 25% util (not late, mind you ... rather, I simply missed my statement cut dates).  Guess what:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of 1-Aug:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EQ-FICO = 605 with 9% util.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TU-FICO = 558 with 9% util&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As of 1-Sept:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EQ-FICO = 598 with 24% util ... a 7 pt drop OH NOE!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TU-FICO = 599 with 24% util ... a 41 pt increase ... YEAH BAYBEEE!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What changed?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cap1 began reporting my new CC ($550 CL)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Made my payments *after* my statement cut dates thereby increasing my util from 9% to 24% &amp;lt;face palm&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Had a baddie adjusted on my TU: lates removed ... balance set to $0 ... account closed ... now reporting as &amp;quot;Never Late / Paid As Agreed&amp;quot;   WOOHOO!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Considering the above three factors, a new TL does make a temporary small ding but the increase in TL *can* lower your util and the removal of a single baddie *can* make a huge difference.  My next score pull on 1-Oct, I am hoping, should be quite nice! :)  Ok, I've finished babbling.  These results are mine and YMMV but I would imagine they are typical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 17:18:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Real-World-Example-of-Util-TL-Baddie-v-s-Score/m-p/1568662#M205080</guid>
      <dc:creator>ApexdvToo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-01T17:18:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Real World Example of Util/TL/Baddie v/s Score</title>
      <link>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Real-World-Example-of-Util-TL-Baddie-v-s-Score/m-p/1570132#M205200</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Almost a 50pt gain in one month:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aug 1: Util   80%    EQ MyFICO   646&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sep 1: Util   20%    EQ MyFICO   694&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only other changes - addition of some inquiries, one new account with a 300 limit, and a drop of about 800 in installment debt - still over 30,000, so I don't think that made much difference. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I paid multiple accounts off at the beginning of August., so there's been a huge drop in utilization and multiple accounts now have zero balances - where they will stay for the forseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 18:32:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Rebuilding-Your-Credit/Real-World-Example-of-Util-TL-Baddie-v-s-Score/m-p/1570132#M205200</guid>
      <dc:creator>tbolt2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-02T18:32:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

