Reply
Valued Contributor
Scupra
Posts: 1,354
Registered: ‎07-12-2012
0

Should these accounts be reporting like this?

My chapter 7 BK was discharged in October of this year and I have a couple accounts reporting like:

 

Status - Charge Off; Type of Account - Revolving; Type of Loan - Charge Account; Whose Account - Individual Account; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - Consumer Disputes - Reinvestigation in Process; Account Transferred or Sold; Charged Off Account; Charge; 

 

My other accounts are all showing iibk besides about four which all say the above. Should theese be reporting iibk? I submitted online disputes and they say it is reporting correctly. I am trying to make sure my report looks right after the BK because of what I read in another thread.. Do I need to send out certified letters now? Thank you a head of time for your help, AND happy Thanksgiving!

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
692 EQ FICO 09/2014
680 TU FICO 09/2014
671 EX FICO 09/2014
$14k NFCU Flagship Sig - $14k NFCU cashRewards Sig - $15k NavChek - $6k Barclays Arrival + - $5k Cap1 Quicksilver
Valued Contributor
Scupra
Posts: 1,354
Registered: ‎07-12-2012
0

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

All of these accounts are the OC that have sold the accounts off. They are reporting as "PIF charge off" I made a quick call to the OC and they told me they are not the owner and it is reporting correctly. Is this right, or do I need to send it certified letters with a copy of my discharge paperwork showing they were iibk? Thank you so much again, I just really want my report to be 100% accurate so I can start all over  

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
692 EQ FICO 09/2014
680 TU FICO 09/2014
671 EX FICO 09/2014
$14k NFCU Flagship Sig - $14k NFCU cashRewards Sig - $15k NavChek - $6k Barclays Arrival + - $5k Cap1 Quicksilver
Frequent Contributor
shols44
Posts: 397
Registered: ‎11-03-2012
0

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

It depends.

 

If the accounts were CO's before being included in BK, then they are reporting correctly. A CO is considered a final event in an account reporting. So the account was already finalized and you owed nothing. Including it in a BK afterwards changes nothing from the reporting party's stand point. You owed nothing, and a finalized status was already reported. 

 

If you included them before they were CO then you could make a case but most of the time the CO status preceeds BK and is considered a finalized account. While this is disputable, you dispute reason must be different. Do you disagree with, the credit limit, high balance etc reported. You can dispute based on that, but not on the status. 


Starting Score: 501
Current Score: 706 EQ,TU 689,EX 686
Goal Score: 720

Valued Contributor
Scupra
Posts: 1,354
Registered: ‎07-12-2012
0

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

Forgot to respond to this and just wanted to say thank you. you cleared up my confusion :smileyhappy:

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
692 EQ FICO 09/2014
680 TU FICO 09/2014
671 EX FICO 09/2014
$14k NFCU Flagship Sig - $14k NFCU cashRewards Sig - $15k NavChek - $6k Barclays Arrival + - $5k Cap1 Quicksilver

myFICO is the consumer division of FICO. Since its introduction 20 years ago, the FICO® Score has become a global standard for measuring credit risk in the banking, mortgage, credit card, auto and retail industries. 90 of the top 100 largest U.S. financial institutions use the FICO Score to make consumer credit decisions.

>> About myFICO
FICO Score - The Score that matters
Click to Verify - This site chose VeriSign SSL for secure e-commerce and confidential communications.
Fair Isaac Corporation is a BBB Accredited Financial Service in San Rafael, CA
FOLLOW US Social Media Facebook Twitter Pinterest Google+