cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Should these accounts be reporting like this?

tag
Scupra
Super Contributor

Should these accounts be reporting like this?

My chapter 7 BK was discharged in October of this year and I have a couple accounts reporting like:

 

Status - Charge Off; Type of Account - Revolving; Type of Loan - Charge Account; Whose Account - Individual Account; ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - Consumer Disputes - Reinvestigation in Process; Account Transferred or Sold; Charged Off Account; Charge; 

 

My other accounts are all showing iibk besides about four which all say the above. Should theese be reporting iibk? I submitted online disputes and they say it is reporting correctly. I am trying to make sure my report looks right after the BK because of what I read in another thread.. Do I need to send out certified letters now? Thank you a head of time for your help, AND happy Thanksgiving!

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
801 EQ FICO 06/2022
797 TU FICO 04/2022
793 EX FICO 04/2022
$30k NFCU Platinum | $30.7k NFCU cashRewards Sig | $15k NavChek | $7.1k Cap1 Quicksilver | $10k Amazon Store | $19k Cap1 VentureOne | $16k Barclay Aviator | $5k Chase Freedom | $5k Chase Sapphire Preferred | $9k Costco Visa | $20k AMEX BCE | AMEX Gold | NFCU Platinum #2 $19.3k | Apple $8.5k
Message 1 of 4
3 REPLIES 3
Scupra
Super Contributor

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

All of these accounts are the OC that have sold the accounts off. They are reporting as "PIF charge off" I made a quick call to the OC and they told me they are not the owner and it is reporting correctly. Is this right, or do I need to send it certified letters with a copy of my discharge paperwork showing they were iibk? Thank you so much again, I just really want my report to be 100% accurate so I can start all over  

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
801 EQ FICO 06/2022
797 TU FICO 04/2022
793 EX FICO 04/2022
$30k NFCU Platinum | $30.7k NFCU cashRewards Sig | $15k NavChek | $7.1k Cap1 Quicksilver | $10k Amazon Store | $19k Cap1 VentureOne | $16k Barclay Aviator | $5k Chase Freedom | $5k Chase Sapphire Preferred | $9k Costco Visa | $20k AMEX BCE | AMEX Gold | NFCU Platinum #2 $19.3k | Apple $8.5k
Message 2 of 4
shols44
Frequent Contributor

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

It depends.

 

If the accounts were CO's before being included in BK, then they are reporting correctly. A CO is considered a final event in an account reporting. So the account was already finalized and you owed nothing. Including it in a BK afterwards changes nothing from the reporting party's stand point. You owed nothing, and a finalized status was already reported. 

 

If you included them before they were CO then you could make a case but most of the time the CO status preceeds BK and is considered a finalized account. While this is disputable, you dispute reason must be different. Do you disagree with, the credit limit, high balance etc reported. You can dispute based on that, but not on the status. 


Starting Score: 501
Current Score: 754 EQ,TU 745,EX 750
Goal Score: 800

Message 3 of 4
Scupra
Super Contributor

Re: Should these accounts be reporting like this?

Forgot to respond to this and just wanted to say thank you. you cleared up my confusion Smiley Happy

Filed BK7: 7/2012 (start score EQ 560 / TU 529) Discharge 10/2012
801 EQ FICO 06/2022
797 TU FICO 04/2022
793 EX FICO 04/2022
$30k NFCU Platinum | $30.7k NFCU cashRewards Sig | $15k NavChek | $7.1k Cap1 Quicksilver | $10k Amazon Store | $19k Cap1 VentureOne | $16k Barclay Aviator | $5k Chase Freedom | $5k Chase Sapphire Preferred | $9k Costco Visa | $20k AMEX BCE | AMEX Gold | NFCU Platinum #2 $19.3k | Apple $8.5k
Message 4 of 4
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.