Reply
Established Contributor
Posts: 564
Registered: ‎02-21-2008
0

850,000 People affected

850,000 Chase card holders with low fixed rates were targeted this week with a payment increase that will more than double the payment each month with out a opt-out option. Although I haven't received any letters, I did receive BT checks good through May 2011. I thought wow!, but now that I heard this news, I will not use them!
Established Contributor
Posts: 991
Registered: ‎05-14-2008
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

[ Edited ]
Assuming that you are talking about the 5% of balance minimum payment I would say no one should be using a card for purchases or taking BT's if they can't pay at least 5% every month.  Even at this rate it would take almost two years to pay off the loan.  This is NOT what CC's were meant to be used for.  Somehow we have morphed into believing CC's are a long term viable alternative to the old sytle fixed rate loan you would get from your local banker.  They aren't.  In the wrong hands they are deadly.  People should stay away from using them as a long term funding option.
Message Edited by Watchmann on 06-28-2009 07:28 AM
Established Contributor
Posts: 564
Registered: ‎02-21-2008
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

Yes I was, speaking of the 5%. After speaking to them, they claim that there would be a memo on my account if this action was going to take place. Still, I will think twice about doing a bt at a "so called" fixed rate of .99 until 5/11
Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,671
Registered: ‎05-24-2007
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

To have it paid off by 5/2011, you would need to pay more than 5% of the remaining balance. As the balance goes down, your payment would also. Even if the first payment was 5% of the balance and you continued to pay that amount in dollars for the whole period, it would take almost two years.

 

I have a low interest, 2.5 year BT from Chase. I am paying a bit more than 5% at the third month of the 2.5 years. The required minimum payment according to my current statement is about 1.85%. If I was silly enough to pay that little, I would still owe a lot in mid 2001.

 

Are you looking for reasonable interest rate and payment OR are you looking for an unreasonable low interest rate and payment, which would put most people in a difficult situation at the end of the term?

Established Contributor
Posts: 720
Registered: ‎05-04-2007
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

From indications so far, this is the second wave of minimum payment increases aimed at customers who have an account balance from a low-APR (6.99% or less) life-of-the-balance BT. Either the BT or the account is at least two years old, and generally there have been no other purchases on the account, only the BT. It is clearly Chase's purpose (justified or not) to accelerate the repayment schedule so a customer is not stretching repayment to 10-12-15 years at a fixed 2.99%, 3.99%, etc. rate, by paying only 2% monthly on a slowly-decreasing principal.

 

It is quite similar to the action Chase took at the beginning of the year with the $10 fee (rescinded due to legal challenges) and 5% minimum payment. It appears this wave includes customers with 5.99% and 6.99% APRs (not included in the previous wave) and customers who have reached the 2-year milestone since January.

 

Some customers have reported being offered alternatives by CSRs, such as keeping their 2% minimum payment if they agree to have their APR increased.

 

From reports I've read so far, this minimum payment increase does not affect fixed-term BT offers (such as the 2011 BT) or "normal" accounts ...

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,668
Registered: ‎02-18-2009
0

Re: 850,000 People affected


plasticguy wrote:
850,000 Chase card holders with low fixed rates were targeted this week with a payment increase that will more than double the payment each month with out a opt-out option. Although I haven't received any letters, I did receive BT checks good through May 2011. I thought wow!, but now that I heard this news, I will not use them!

 

Analysts have decided they need to take low interest money off the table so they can re-issue it at higher rates and profit margins.
Signature line begins:
Credit is not a right, but a business transaction, one that takes into account risk, and charges accordingly based on that risk.
Your credit score is an aspect of your credit profile. Important? yes but just an aspect. Contributing/supplemental information determines the finer point of the deal. Ask any question, respect me not to get mad if the answer is not the affirmation you are looking for,
Established Contributor
Posts: 564
Registered: ‎02-21-2008
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

I'm happy with the 1.99% until March 2010 with BOFA ! No 5% required (yet)
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 372
Registered: ‎06-15-2007
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

I'm currently using my 2nd BT from Chase (disney). I always pay off in 1 yr - take amount, divide by 12 and that is my monthly payment. Never go by the min amount due. Maybe this is why they have not bothered me. I like to use BT's for payment history.

 

On my second card (perfectcard) I received notice that the apr is changing to 10.24% (it was 9.24). When I opened the account (May '08)  the terms were 0% for 6months then 10.99; but instead dropped to 9.24 matching my disney account. So in August they will up the rate to 1pt: I consider myself lucky!  Also, this is a PIF before statement cuts so apr does not matter.

01/04/10 TU 778 EQ 731
08/05/09 TU 762 EQ 722
02/12/09 TU 722 EQ 704 EX 690
EQ sensitive to inqs & student loan.
Established Contributor
Posts: 672
Registered: ‎07-05-2008
0

Re: 850,000 People affected


Watchmann wrote:
Assuming that you are talking about the 5% of balance minimum payment I would say no one should be using a card for purchases or taking BT's if they can't pay at least 5% every month.  Even at this rate it would take almost two years to pay off the loan.  This is NOT what CC's were meant to be used for.  Somehow we have morphed into believing CC's are a long term viable alternative to the old sytle fixed rate loan you would get from your local banker.  They aren't.  In the wrong hands they are deadly.  People should stay away from using them as a long term funding option.
Message Edited by Watchmann on 06-28-2009 07:28 AM

Agreed!

 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,291
Registered: ‎02-26-2008
0

Re: 850,000 People affected

Regardless of what you "should" be doing, there are probably at least a few people that are going to be pushed into default that otherwise would have been able to continue without going negative. I've seen where people were coaxed into using the BTs as a replacement for other LOCs that might have been available.
Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.