@Imperfectfuture wrote:
@kdm31091 wrote:
I think it was only a matter of time. Few issuers move limits so easily with no HP.However, as has been pointed out, this is a high YMMV thing. Today was strange, made a payment on chase amazon, and first time didn't give me auto apply (though I didn't need an auto apply). Maybe they don't like how my current spend on SimplyCash, but the Ink is too hard to get for the stage my self employment is in guys. They will see some love in six months or so. But they told me when I got the card, and for future cRds, I would have no problem moving things around. At least not signing up for ton of travel perks (or this could all have some sway with losing the contract for Costco to citi, who knows.)
again, in, unless we see widespread reports from csr's, this could be more of an anamoly than the wave of the future.
We will just have to wait and see. There is no official word yet, obviously. We're just speculating 
I just would not be surprised IF they implement a HP policy because of how easy it is to "get a CLI" without a HP from them right now via rolling limits. It's nice for us, of course, but it kind of defeats the point of them having HP CLIs if you can just move a limit around and get your CLI that way. So I could see why they would want to make this more difficult to do.
@kdm31091 wrote:
@Imperfectfuture wrote:
@kdm31091 wrote:
I think it was only a matter of time. Few issuers move limits so easily with no HP.However, as has been pointed out, this is a high YMMV thing. Today was strange, made a payment on chase amazon, and first time didn't give me auto apply (though I didn't need an auto apply). Maybe they don't like how my current spend on SimplyCash, but the Ink is too hard to get for the stage my self employment is in guys. They will see some love in six months or so. But they told me when I got the card, and for future cRds, I would have no problem moving things around. At least not signing up for ton of travel perks (or this could all have some sway with losing the contract for Costco to citi, who knows.)
again, in, unless we see widespread reports from csr's, this could be more of an anamoly than the wave of the future.
We will just have to wait and see. There is no official word yet, obviously. We're just speculating
I just would not be surprised IF they implement a HP policy because of how easy it is to "get a CLI" without a HP from them right now via rolling limits. It's nice for us, of course, but it kind of defeats the point of them having HP CLIs if you can just move a limit around and get your CLI that way. So I could see why they would want to make this more difficult to do.
And, I wouldn't want this to go churning vs no churning, if you get my drift. Obviously not churning an Amazon card, but folks are going to do what they are going to do. Wish lists are not facts. 
And, while we seek what might be happening, we DO want to stick with the facts. The FT forums would be the first to have this info if it was a widespread phenomenon. 
@kdm31091 wrote:
The thing that would likely get you "noticed" more is closing the old card right when AF comes due/after collecting bonus etc, right after moving limits. Moving and then closing could be percieved more "red flag" than just moving limits but retaining the cards.
This is pure speculation and not related to anything in this thread, the OP was closing a Slate, which has no bonus or AF.
Way too much scaremongering on this board, IMO. Events that are specific to an individual's situation are then extrapolated to general statements that become gospel, like never carry a balance on an Amex, never make a minimum payment, and now moving limits between Chase cards might result in a CLD. 
@sillykitty1 wrote:
@kdm31091 wrote:
The thing that would likely get you "noticed" more is closing the old card right when AF comes due/after collecting bonus etc, right after moving limits. Moving and then closing could be percieved more "red flag" than just moving limits but retaining the cards.
This is pure speculation and not related to anything in this thread, the OP was closing a Slate, which has no bonus or AF.
Way too much scaremongering on this board, IMO. Events that are specific to an individual's situation are then extrapolated to general statements that become gospel, like never carry a balance on an Amex, never make a minimum payment, and now moving limits between Chase cards might result in a CLD.
Huh? I never said moving limits will cause a CLD
I said Chase may start requiring HP for moving limits. I said nothing about it causing a CLD....I simply said it "could" be percieved as a red flag. Could indicates that I'm well aware it is speculation and not "gospel".
Moving limits IS relevant to this thread. The freaking title is "requesting to consolidate....may result in review" so...it's relevant.
I'm also not the one that brought up moving limits, it has been discussed since the first page of the thread, and I was just saying I wouldn't be surprised if Chase changed policies about it. I don't know if they will or not.
For the record, though, I certainly disagree with "never carry a balance on Amex" and "never make a min payment" because those are overblown, overused statements