No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Utill hasn't changed. I haven't had a late payment with my current freedom card or any card in my file in over 7 years. In the past about 7 years ago I had a chaged off card with Chase. I did pay the collection company and that has fallen off report. I guess Chase does hold it against me. Meanwhile I have 2 amex revolvers and one charge and 3 citi cards all above 6000 CL each. Go figure
@youngandcreditwrthy wrote:
Lol@FinStar...
Always tryina "get my goat"
OH! "GMG"...
Haha perhaps that is an excessive acronym
Didn't Amex lose a lawsuit for $100+ million for treating customers poorly who had burned them outside of the SOL or 7 year period? Or denying clis for similar reasons?
Yeppers... they got sued and had to pay $112.5 million in refunds and fines to settle regulators' accusations that it charged unlawful late fees and deceived customers to pressure them to pay off old debts or buy extra credit card services... this all stemmed from like 2003. The settlement was announced during 4Q12. It was an AMEX ouchie for sure!
What was your bad account? Did you have a CO?
@youngandcreditwrthy wrote:
Pahahahaha!
So is it safe to infer that Chase's practice with this poster is Amex like? Aka...worthy the CFPB investigating....
Not the same thing. Amex got busted for two main things:
1) Getting people to pay off charged off debt by implying it would help their credit even if the old debt was past SOL/Reporting Limitations and not on credit report
2) Getting people to subscribe to some program by implying they would get $300 credit
As a result, AMEX was forced to give the $300 payments and return money collected from old debts outside SOL/Reporting Limits. Additionally they had to pay a bribe to the government for their time and effort.
In the OPs case, Chase is well within their rights to consider everything they have info on when considering how to handle OPs account. On the other hand, I think it is bad CS on their part. Either reject the guy and tell him it was because of bad debt or forgive him/give me a card/move on.
@youngandcreditwrthy wrote:
Pahahahaha!
So is it safe to infer that Chase's practice with this poster is Amex like? Aka...worthy the CFPB investigating....
Well, from what I've been reading and watching lately, it appears they're under a bit of scrutiny and dealing with like 7 separate litigation efforts... all from different fronts so it's going to be interesting how it's going to pan out for them... It's still going to be an ouchie for sure ...LOL
@Crashem wrote:
@youngandcreditwrthy wrote:
Pahahahaha!
So is it safe to infer that Chase's practice with this poster is Amex like? Aka...worthy the CFPB investigating....Not the same thing. Amex got busted for two main things:
1) Getting people to pay off charged off debt by implying it would help their credit even if the old debt was past SOL/Reporting Limitations and not on credit report
2) Getting people to subscribe to some program by implying they would get $300 credit
As a result, AMEX was forced to give the $300 payments and return money collected from old debts outside SOL/Reporting Limits. Additionally they had to pay a bribe to the government for their time and effort.
In the OPs case, Chase is well within their rights to consider everything they have info on when considering how to handle OPs account. On the other hand, I think it is bad CS on their part. Either reject the guy and tell him it was because of bad debt or forgive him/give me a card/move on.
+1 Personally, I would be careful about carelessly throwing out threats of CFPB investigations less it actually dilutes the seriousnes of a CFPB complaint.