No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
From reading the forums I have come to the conclusion that generally, if one has multiple revolving credit accounts, producing the best CS will result in having one CC report <9% utl, while other CCs report a $0 balance.
If I practice this method and I ALWAYS USE THE SAME CCs to report a $0 balance over the course of lets say, 3 to 6 to 9 months to a year. What kind of affect will this have on my CS.
Assuming all cards are showing activity in regard to the CCCs.
I was thinking in terms of only one account showing activity on my CR. Is this a bad thing? Or does it even matter?
@Anonymous wrote:I was thinking in terms of only one account showing activity on my CR. Is this a bad thing? Or does it even matter?
Having a balance of $0 month to month isn't the same as an inactive card. Personally I don't risk it though and unless I'm apping for something, I leave some random amount of a few bucks and shrapnel on each and go on with life. Some older analysis might assume an unchanging balance is inactivity; however, payments made in a month do get reported to the bureaus, so FICO is certainly sophisticated enough to see whether a card is inactive or not from that measure.
The only issue I've found with an unchanging balance, is sometimes it gets lost in the lender reporting for any given month (Discover seems to be prone to this especially) but I've had it happen personally with BOFA before. As a result, I just vary my balances and haven't seen it be an issue across any of my tradelines... but also I charge a little something even on a card I really don't use, every month. That's probably overkill, but it works for me.
@Revelate wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:I was thinking in terms of only one account showing activity on my CR. Is this a bad thing? Or does it even matter?
Having a balance of $0 month to month isn't the same as an inactive card. Personally I don't risk it though and unless I'm apping for something, I leave some random amount of a few bucks and shrapnel on each and go on with life. Some older analysis might assume an unchanging balance is inactivity; however, payments made in a month do get reported to the bureaus, so FICO is certainly sophisticated enough to see whether a card is inactive or not from that measure.
The only issue I've found with an unchanging balance, is sometimes it gets lost in the lender reporting for any given month (Discover seems to be prone to this especially) but I've had it happen personally with BOFA before. As a result, I just vary my balances and haven't seen it be an issue across any of my tradelines... but also I charge a little something even on a card I really don't use, every month. That's probably overkill, but it works for me.
I see, I wouldnt call it overkill. Better safe than sorry! Thanks for the help!
Not to hijack your thread, but...
I have only one card, would it be better to carry a small balance ($5-$10) ? or would I be better off paying to a $0 balance every month?
@jsucool76 wrote:Not to hijack your thread, but...
I have only one card, would it be better to carry a small balance ($5-$10) ? or would I be better off paying to a $0 balance every month?
With a CL of $3000. I would say it would be best to let your statement post with $270 or less. That way you would be utilizing 9% or less of your available credit. This is ideal based on what I've read. Then when your credit card company asks for a minimum payment. Pay in full to avoid interest.
Hope this helps!
Thank you kindly for the info. Credit isn't as easy to handle as some of these high rollers make it seem.
@jsucool76 wrote:Thank you kindly for the info. Credit isn't as easy to handle as some of these high rollers make it seem.
I think it is easy when you are not apping for cards or other loans. Your FICO does not have to be at its peak all the time. IMO, as long as the bills are paid don't worry about maxing your score.