04-01-2013 07:55 PM
I admit that I am not 100% sure that this practice exists, but if it indeed does, it is very much unfair. As I understand it, FICO analyzes individuals statistically based on their respective credit report data. Presumably, people in the same data range (or "bucket") have similar parameters in regard to AAoA, # of accounts, utilization, etc. Now, here is the unfair part...if you work hard to correct any negatives and build your profile to another level (good to excellent, etc.) FICO will then put you into another "bucket" or credit category and then score you under those more stringent and "favorable" data points. So you are now being scored compared to people with much better credit report parameters, and your score may very well go down instead of up. The only way this would be fair is if card issuers know about re-bucketing and take it into account. Please post your opinions and/or knowledge, because this just seems wrong to me...lol!
04-01-2013 08:05 PM - edited 04-01-2013 08:05 PM
If it happens, it doesn't matter to me, and I don't think it should matter unless someone is currently looking to buy a house or something. Time changes everything and if your scores fall, they will recover.
No point in crying over unsplit milk.
myFICO is the consumer division of FICO. Since its introduction 20 years ago, the FICO® Score has become a global standard for measuring credit risk in the banking, mortgage, credit card, auto and retail industries. 90 of the top 100 largest U.S. financial institutions use the FICO Score to make consumer credit decisions.>> About myFICO