SAYING IT AGAIN

[-Cal-]

I would have to agree with this thread by stating we lose a great deal of efficiency by merging all of the NASA threads. It is quite a pain to read through 10+ pages to extract specific information such as how sensitive they are to inquiries, how recon friendly they are, if they're tax lien friendly, etc...

It is also my humble opinion that this decision would discourage users from sharing their personal experience by minimizing them to becoming just another "cog in the wheel". This would potentially reduce the amount of content and knowledge shared here in this great community. 

Thanks for reading!

[longtimelurker]

---

@-Cal- wrote:

I would have to agree with this thread by stating we lose a great deal of efficiency by merging all of the NASA threads. It is quite a pain to read through 10+ pages to extract specific information such as how sensitive they are to inquiries, how recon friendly they are, if they're tax lien friendly, etc...

It is also my humble opinion that this decision would discourage users from sharing their personal experience by minimizing them to becoming just another "cog in the wheel". This would potentially reduce the amount of content and knowledge shared here in this great community. 

Thanks for reading!

---

Maybe, but people must also take the time to give a good title to their threads.   We have stuff like "Is it true?", "Should I do this" and even "Saying it again".  I remember at the peak of Nasa-mania, we had both "NASA FCU" and "nasa fcu" as thread titles.   If you are looking for recon friendly etc, that is as useless as one big thread, except you have to search in multiple threads.

[Themanwhocan]

This is another of those threads complaining about other threads being merged together, isn't it?

Can't we get these merge-complaint threads merged into one? Otherwise, they are just too easy and convenient to read.

[longtimelurker]

---

@Themanwhocan wrote:

This is another of those threads complaining about other threads being merged together, isn't it?

Can't we get these merge-complaint threads merged into one? Otherwise, they are just too easy and convenient to read.

---

This is just a subtle attempt to get a "TMWC Charts" subforum established, and made required reading before posting.    I can see through your smokescreen.

[-Cal-]

---

@longtimelurker wrote:

---

@-Cal- wrote:

I would have to agree with this thread by stating we lose a great deal of efficiency by merging all of the NASA threads. It is quite a pain to read through 10+ pages to extract specific information such as how sensitive they are to inquiries, how recon friendly they are, if they're tax lien friendly, etc...

It is also my humble opinion that this decision would discourage users from sharing their personal experience by minimizing them to becoming just another "cog in the wheel". This would potentially reduce the amount of content and knowledge shared here in this great community. 

Thanks for reading!

---

Maybe, but people must also take the time to give a good title to their threads.   We have stuff like "Is it true?", "Should I do this" and even "Saying it again".  I remember at the peak of Nasa-mania, we had both "NASA FCU" and "nasa fcu" as thread titles.   If you are looking for recon friendly etc, that is as useless as one big thread, except you have to search in multiple threads.

---

I 100% agree with your post. One of my pet peeves are threads created with useless titles such as this one and the ones you mentioned. There have been many occasions where I wanted to reply asking the OP to change the title. However, a thread like this would show up via the search feature and the information would typically be easily accessible within the first few posts. 

[Themanwhocan]

---

@longtimelurker wrote:

---

@Themanwhocan wrote:

This is another of those threads complaining about other threads being merged together, isn't it?

Can't we get these merge-complaint threads merged into one? Otherwise, they are just too easy and convenient to read.

---

This is just a subtle attempt to get a "TMWC Charts" subforum established, and made required reading before posting.    I can see through your smokescreen.

---

I expect they will create one eventually. Probably by merging my various posts

[myjourney]

---

@Themanwhocan wrote:

---

@longtimelurker wrote:

---

@Themanwhocan wrote:

This is another of those threads complaining about other threads being merged together, isn't it?

Can't we get these merge-complaint threads merged into one? Otherwise, they are just too easy and convenient to read.

---

This is just a subtle attempt to get a "TMWC Charts" subforum established, and made required reading before posting.    I can see through your smokescreen.

---

I expect they will create one eventually. Probably by merging my various posts

---

Or charts 

I'm all for that as it's a very useful tool that all should utilize.....

Kudos for that

[lhcole77]

---

@-Cal- wrote:

I would have to agree with this thread by stating we lose a great deal of efficiency by merging all of the NASA threads. It is quite a pain to read through 10+ pages to extract specific information such as how sensitive they are to inquiries, how recon friendly they are, if they're tax lien friendly, etc...

It is also my humble opinion that this decision would discourage users from sharing their personal experience by minimizing them to becoming just another "cog in the wheel". This would potentially reduce the amount of content and knowledge shared here in this great community. 

Thanks for reading!

---

When all else fails for me I go to the google. I search for criteria like you listed above and undoubtedly it brings up myFICO Forums and the related posts I am looking for 9.9 times out of 10.

[juggalo9er]

---

@tcbofade wrote:

On a very related note, there are still THREE NASA threads on the FIRST page of the CC forum.

I don't think any of the evil moderators are trying to hold you astronauts down.

---

counting icounting is essential! four amex threads, how many of those have been combined?

[keithB]

---

@juggalo9er wrote:

If we are going to move all NASA posts can we do the same for AMEX? consolidating all the posts into one thread simply gets the post lost in the massive thread already going?

3x, fr, mr, backdating......

---

Maybe AMEX pays FICO for services that NASA doesn't?