@Revelate wrote:
@tamaralig wrote:ddemari mines did the same...card number the same but reports as a new tl with the original open date though.
That could be just CK too; I had a tradeline update recently and it did a similar you don't see it now you do thing on CK in one update.
Likely just part of their software algorithm for detecting changes and it saw it as a new tradeline and the old one it had in it's records wasn't there... hence the new / delete notation.
It's not....It's also on myfico..not to be negative but I wouldn't have posted it if I didn't know what I was looking at 
Here's some extra proof for the pudding... that alert is dated 3/23 and that was an EQ alert from myfico and same as the original screen shots show EQ on CK.
All of them? Oh, yes please. Not one complaint from me.
I have a $3k CL, I only ever use it on Amazon, and I put quite a bit through it. They better hurry, though, as I will be changing all my Amazon spend back to Discover come July 
@tamaralig wrote:
@Revelate wrote:
@tamaralig wrote:ddemari mines did the same...card number the same but reports as a new tl with the original open date though.
That could be just CK too; I had a tradeline update recently and it did a similar you don't see it now you do thing on CK in one update.
Likely just part of their software algorithm for detecting changes and it saw it as a new tradeline and the old one it had in it's records wasn't there... hence the new / delete notation.
It's not....It's also on myfico..not to be negative but I wouldn't have posted it if I didn't know what I was looking at
I do believe I wasn't clear in the last message:
A tradeline change happened. MF's monitoring picks that up as a tradeline change.
CK on the other hand, as has happened to me previously and from the looks of your post you as well, doesn't recognize as a tradeline changing, rather it recognizes as a new tradeline and the former one being gone... hence the tradeline deletion and creation notation on CK.
Anyway doesn't really matter, the tradeline is correct on the bureau in my experience so it doesn't matter.
@Anonymous wrote:
@creditguy wrote:
Here's my theory and it's just a shot in the dark, higher swipe fees. Now that you can get a Visa Signature with a $500 limit I'd say the precieved prestige factor for signature is gone, just like the $300 gm buypower WEMC's.Yes, mine got upgraded too, and no offense to anyone who got the upgrade, but I think it's a lame decision to assign the Signature status to cards with very low limits (I believe mine shouldn't be upgraded either). There really should be a threshold of $4-5K, like it used to be (if it ever did) for an account to be on the Signature status. But anyway, Visa might come up with something else for their higher end cards, who nows.
By the way there was another thread on the same topic recently, maybe a moderator can merge them.
lol? There is like 5-10 threads about this ....
@creditguy wrote:
Here's my theory and it's just a shot in the dark, higher swipe fees. Now that you can get a Visa Signature with a $500 limit I'd say the precieved prestige factor for signature is gone, just like the $300 gm buypower WEMC's.
Please don't remind me 