No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
And while the Capital One Venture doesn't have many followers here, using trumptets notation to compare that to Fidelity Amex (after the first year), the math(s) is:
0.02x - $59 = 0.02x
with no (finite) solution. Which means, unsurprisingly, Cap One Venture is always worse than Fidelity Amex, as they provide the same rate of benefit, one with an AF and one without. Yet this card was the Card of the Year etc in many of the financial rags!
(OK, to be fair, it does have no FTF whereas Fidelity has 1%)
@longtimelurker wrote:And while the Capital One Venture doesn't have many followers here, using trumptets notation to compare that to Fidelity Amex (after the first year), the math(s) is:
0.02x - $59 = 0.02x
with no (finite) solution. Which means, unsurprisingly, Cap One Venture is always worse than Fidelity Amex, as they provide the same rate of benefit, one with an AF and one without. Yet this card was the Card of the Year etc in many of the financial rags!
(OK, to be fair, it does have no FTF whereas Fidelity has 1%)
The deal breaker for me on CapOne Venture are the low CLs and horrible customer service. As far as Fidelity, it's an AMEX with FTF, since I make the Arrival my main card specially when travelling abroad thats is problem as it's acceptance is getting lower and lower. In Europe for instance its acceptance is very bad.
So many insightful posts. Especially the mathematical breakdown!
Glad to see someone displaying some math
I never understand why people get annual fee cards unless they have outrageous spending - I suppose for the sign-up bonuses? I mean, spending a few thousand per month may be reasonable at certain incomes, but this is assuming you have other 5% cards for certain categories and this is just on non-category purchases.
@gh17 wrote:Glad to see someone displaying some math
I never understand why people get annual fee cards unless they have outrageous spending - I suppose for the sign-up bonuses? I mean, spending a few thousand per month may be reasonable at certain incomes, but this is assuming you have other 5% cards for certain categories and this is just on non-category purchases.
It's not tht complicated. Everyone has different spending needs. For us, the AF on the BCP is well worth it because the card works for our spending needs. And we don't have outrageous soending. But for others, the AF might not be worth it. It's something everyone has to figure out for themselves.
Even after I downgrade the Barclay Arrival to the no-AF version, I'll still have a use for it in my occasional, infrequent travel since that will definitely become my main spender abroad. The two categories that count, dining, and travel purchases, will be the only ones I'll really need. What I liked about the non-AF version was that FTF is still waived.
@gh17 wrote:Glad to see someone displaying some math
I never understand why people get annual fee cards unless they have outrageous spending - I suppose for the sign-up bonuses? I mean, spending a few thousand per month may be reasonable at certain incomes, but this is assuming you have other 5% cards for certain categories and this is just on non-category purchases.
There's nothing wrong per se with an annual fee. If you are looking long term, all that matters is whether the total rewards of the card (benefits - AF) are better than other cards you could reasonably get. The problem with the Arrival is that there are other free cards with similar (or better) reward structures, pushing the point when Arrival wins very high.
But in other cases, if a card gives you elite status, lounge access, or transfer to partners, the AF may very well be worth it, although you will need to constantly reevaluate (e.g. with reduction of access for American Express, the creation of a free MR card etc).
@gh17 wrote:Glad to see someone displaying some math
I never understand why people get annual fee cards unless they have outrageous spending - I suppose for the sign-up bonuses? I mean, spending a few thousand per month may be reasonable at certain incomes, but this is assuming you have other 5% cards for certain categories and this is just on non-category purchases.
For strictly personal spending I probably wouldn't have an AF card (except maybe a Chase Sapphire Preferred for being able to earn miles at a rate that would exceed the AF but I would have to do the math to see if my personal spending would even cover the AF) and then maybe a hotel card where the annual bonus of a free room outweighs the cost of the AF (and gives additional benefits like room upgrades and what not) - i.e. a Hyatt or Marriott card.
The reason why it is beneficial for me to have two AF cards is the amount of business spending I put on them - which far outweighs my personal spending.
Many cards with an AF will have available retention "bonuses" as well to offset the fees. Just have to ask! I rarely pay AF's.