No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I think it should be that way, but it isn't. No one is required to report.
haulingthescoreup wrote:
Hey, can we lower the temperature on this thread a bit, please?
All this misinterpreting of one another's motives and meanings should serve to remind us all that it's really easy to misread online postings.
FWIW, I took atlast's response to mean that it seems weird and wrong that a creditor would use a CRA to approve an application, but then wouldn't report to them. That seems surprising to me, because I thought that it was required: if a lender uses the shared info from the credit bureaus, they're supposed to report their experiences back.
@Anonymous wrote:
I think it should be that way, but it isn't. No one is required to report.
@haulingthescoreup wrote:
Hey, can we lower the temperature on this thread a bit, please?
All this misinterpreting of one another's motives and meanings should serve to remind us all that it's really easy to misread online postings.
FWIW, I took atlast's response to mean that it seems weird and wrong that a creditor would use a CRA to approve an application, but then wouldn't report to them. That seems surprising to me, because I thought that it was required: if a lender uses the shared info from the credit bureaus, they're supposed to report their experiences back.
@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
Trying not to be misunderstood I have to add that people can find an added benefit in having credit accounts that do not report to the CRA's.
It is IMPERATIVE to your credit report/score that you DO have accounts that report to the CRA's. Without such reporting, you'd have no credit history.
Accounts like revolutioncard (currently) allow you to keep the CRA's from judging your spending/paying activities with those accounts.
So, it's a very important point not to miss, that revolutioncard doesn't report to the CRA's.
Equally important to me that they don't, as I think of them as a shadow accounts. lol
There's an easy solution for keeping the CRAs unaware of your spending habits: it's called cold hard cash and/or debit cards.
Both are pretty much universally accepted. Why bother with this?
I guess your point makes no more sense to me than mine does to you. I'm not sorry about that, but good luck with the cold hard cash.
haulingthescoreup wrote:
FWIW, I took atlast's response to mean that it seems weird and wrong that a creditor would use a CRA to approve an application, but then wouldn't report to them. That seems surprising to me, because I thought that it was required: if a lender uses the shared info from the credit bureaus, they're supposed to report their experiences back.
haulingthescoreup wrote:
That seems surprising to me, because I thought that it was required: if a lender uses the shared info from the credit bureaus, they're supposed to report their experiences back.
I bought furniture last year and used their financing. They pulled EQ, big fat ding on my CR. They didn't report anywhere and had no intentions of doing so. I had to call them and beg them to report this TL as I was trying to re-establish credit. Well they finally began reporting, again on EQ. Turns out they are considered to be a FINANCE COMPANY - big fat NO NO on your credit report. My EQ score has never been anywhere equal to the other two since then. Now, I wish I'd have never pushed the issue.
I just got two new cell phones and they did an inquiry. Guarantee you that this payment history won't report either unless I were to go into collections with the account. My current landlord checked my EQ report before I signed the lease. She doesn't report any of my timely lease payments at all.
It would be nice if all companies - CC, utility, furniture, leasing agents, etc. - who ding our CR's reported our history as well but it's not always the case. I don't think it's a requirement.
As for the Revolution card, I really like the idea. Finally there's credit that you can actually use without being penalized by FICO for using it. Granted it's not friendly to those who need to establish/re-establish normal credit but sounds like a great alternative to those who already have established TL's but need to make unexpected purchases without the worry of a score drop.
HouseHunter wrote:Granted it's not friendly to those who need to establish/re-establish normal credit but sounds like a great alternative to those who already have established TL's but need to make unexpected purchases without the worry of a score drop.
@Anonymous wrote:
watchnerd, no thanks to you in your failings to humor me here in my well-intentioned thread. You're specifically uninvited to speak that way in my new "revolutioncard is HOT to the MAX" thread. Cleverness isn't your strong suit.
LMAO
BMFB