No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
TheNewWorldMan wrote:
The government stepping in to prevent foreclosures is NOT helping...all it's doing is perpetuating the imbalance that caused the situation in the first place.
@Anonymous wrote:
Believe it or not, this is good long-term news for the economy.
Don't get me wrong...if you're going through foreclosure because you lost your job or got sick or other circumstances beyond your control, I sympathize with your individual plight.
However, for the economy as a whole, one of the main reason's we're in a downturn now is because housing was way overvalued. And the only way we're going to get past that and regain a sound economy is if asset prices--i.e., housing prices--are allowed to correct to market levels. The government stepping in to prevent foreclosures is NOT helping...all it's doing is perpetuating the imbalance that caused the situation in the first place.
dizzier wrote:
for the first time in years i actually agree with GW and seriously hope that he vetoes the housing bail out bill. we need to just let the market do what it needs to do!
TheNewWorldMan wrote:
Believe it or not, this is good long-term news for the economy.
Don't get me wrong...if you're going through foreclosure because you lost your job or got sick or other circumstances beyond your control, I sympathize with your individual plight.
However, for the economy as a whole, one of the main reason's we're in a downturn now is because housing was way overvalued. And the only way we're going to get past that and regain a sound economy is if asset prices--i.e., housing prices--are allowed to correct to market levels. The government stepping in to prevent foreclosures is NOT helping...all it's doing is perpetuating the imbalance that caused the situation in the first place.
As I said - I don't know what the answer is. But one way or another, the country is going to have to pay the bill, and it does not matter if we can afford it. The question is how?
dizzier wrote:
i see your point MV, but the problem with that logic is that it assumes that the government can actually stop what has already happened. the ball is already in motion. the kind of money it would take to stop this from happening is much more than this country can afford.