No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Congress OKs historic bailout bill
Now lets see how much difference it really makes. I'm hoping for the best but expecting the worst at this point. I do have to say I am glad it finnaly passed though.
I can see it now. AE and BofA sending all those letters to people who they CLD'ed saying "Do Over, our bad."
Lets face it, the parties over on consumer credit, ballout or not.
@marty56 wrote:I can see it now. AE and BofA sending all those letters to people who they CLD'ed saying "Do Over, our bad."
Lets face it, the parties over on consumer credit, ballout or not.
The problem I see is that many people think this bailout will help them in getting a mortgage, rasing their property value or even getting a autoloan or credit card.
I hope banks are scared enough now not to loan money to risky people or risky home prices so we dont get in this mess again.
Many people in this forum (me included) have learned from their credit mistakes and have improved their credit. I hope the banks and the government also learn from their mistakes as well.
Anyone notice the Whimpinator asking for 6 billion in loans to bail out CA. He just needs to hire the same people who did such a good job on selling the bailout and he will be good to go.
I think people are in default mortgages just got out of from foreclosure.
I don't know the changes made to the bill so I am only talking about possibilities....
What I'm worried might happen is that gov't might say to someone with a (for expample) $500k, $300k, $100k morgage, can't pay, ok how about $250k, $150k, $50k? Done, pricipal adjusted. Then they run out to sell their homes dropping home prices further to rake in the immidiate profit of $250k, $150k, $50k for not paying bills.
If it gives people more time to make right, ok, I can accept that. I guess we won't know until it rolls out. What they say and do may be different.
I hope it works out for the best. This was expensive.
ilovepizza wrote:I think people are in default mortgages just got out of from foreclosure.
I don't know the changes made to the bill so I am only talking about possibilities....
What I'm worried might happen is that gov't might say to someone with a (for expample) $500k, $300k, $100k morgage, can't pay, ok how about $250k, $150k, $50k? Done, pricipal adjusted. Then they run out to sell their homes dropping home prices further to rake in the immidiate profit of $250k, $150k, $50k for not paying bills.
If it gives people more time to make right, ok, I can accept that. I guess we won't know until it rolls out. What they say and do may be different.
I hope it works out for the best. This was expensive.
Message Edited by ilovepizza on 10-03-2008 07:07 PM
There is a similar program already in place for bad FHA mortgages.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/01/real_estate/hope_for_homeowners/index.htm?postversion=2008100118
@fused wrote:There is a similar program already in place for bad FHA mortgages.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/10/01/real_estate/hope_for_homeowners/index.htm?postversion=2008100118
Thank you. It was informative.
"program requires banks to reduce the loan's principal to 90% of a home's current appraised value, which is likely to be much less than the owner paid for it"
So for example a $700k sale on home, arm mortgage $0 down. $700k on loan.
Under this plan the bank would have to reduce the mortgage to 90% of the current appraised value. So lets say this areas value dropped 30% making the home now worth $490k and less another 10% = $441k.
So this person who took out the arm loan for an investment property purchased a home for $700k but only has to pay $441k saving an instant $259k!!!! While all those with good credit are stuck paying $700k AND paying higher taxes to cover the people not paying the bills. I must have made a mistake somewhere. It doesn't really seam logical. Wouldn't it be better to reduce the interest to even 0%. Ahh but if they reduced the interest and not the principal the person would be locked in a home they could not sell because they would still be upside down. Maybe upside down but they could afford the monthly payments. So instead we reemburse for their bad choices, choices that the banks allowed. hmm.
However... If someone only ows 50% of the value of the home I guess they are going to have to pay whats left over just at a lower int rate.
I understand it was also about trying to save peoples 401ks and so on. Just really messed up. Do you think they will learn from all this?? It still doesn't solve the problem of how it happened.