Reply
Established Contributor
pipeguy
Posts: 716
Registered: ‎10-31-2011
0

Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration's consumer financial watchdog agency is backing off a plan to limit big upfront fees on credit cards, a move that could hit borrowers with poor credit histories especially hard.

 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau acknowledged Thursday that its proposal would increase costs for some cardholders and allow banks to charge more in fees.

...

 

First Premier Bank of Sioux Falls, S.D., had argued that the Fed overstepped when it proposed the tougher rule. The bank had started charging customers a $95 processing fee for credit cards before the account was opened, plus a $75 annual fee. Some cards had a credit limit of $300.

 

The upfront fee allowed First Premier and others to charge people fees totaling far more than 25 percent of their credit lines. The rule was an attempt to close that loophole.

 

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/47035205/ns/business-consumer_news/

*** Remember the Tallyman because he sure remembers you ***
Moderator
pizzadude
Posts: 9,674
Registered: ‎01-28-2010
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

 

Yeah, it is too bad ~ but even if they had been successful somehow I think First Preemie would still find a way to get around the law with new & creative fees like an energy surcharge or statement processing fee, blah, blah, blah....

March2010 FICO® ~ 695 TU, 653 EQ, 697 EX
Moderator
Revelate
Posts: 9,477
Registered: ‎12-30-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

95+75=170.

 

So if 30% of their people basically run up $300 and then don't pay it, that may well be reasonable.  At their strata, they're extending credit to some folks who do exactly that... and I know for one subprime lender I worked at, 30% default rate was a fact of life at one point.

Starting Score: EQ 561, TU 567, EX 599* (12/30/11, EX lender pull 12/29/11)
Current Score: EQ 04 673, EQ 8 707, TU 720, EX 702* (09/02/14, EX older)
Goal Score: 700 on EQ '04 (01/01/15)


Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge
Established Contributor
pipeguy
Posts: 716
Registered: ‎10-31-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

[ Edited ]

Revelate wrote:

95+75=170.

 

So if 30% of their people basically run up $300 and then don't pay it, that may well be reasonable.  At their strata, they're extending credit to some folks who do exactly that... and I know for one subprime lender I worked at, 30% default rate was a fact of life at one point.


Perhaps in that one case, however national default rates (MC/V/AE & Disc) including major sub-prime lender Capital One, are running less than 3% and no more than 5% for the 4th Qtr of 2011 and 1st Qtr of 2012 - nowhere near 30%. First Premier actually reined in their up front charges, they used to be much higher where a $300 CL had maybe $50 to $75 available credit after up front fees plus no grace period on 36% or more APR interest. I don't care how high the expected default rate is, that's just plain Mod Cut of their captive customer base.  

*** Remember the Tallyman because he sure remembers you ***
Moderator
Revelate
Posts: 9,477
Registered: ‎12-30-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

[ Edited ]

pipeguy wrote:

Revelate wrote:

95+75=170.

 

So if 30% of their people basically run up $300 and then don't pay it, that may well be reasonable.  At their strata, they're extending credit to some folks who do exactly that... and I know for one subprime lender I worked at, 30% default rate was a fact of life at one point.


Perhaps in that one case, however national default rates (MC/V/AE & Disc) including major sub-prime lender Capital One, are running less than 3% and no more than 5% for the 4th Qtr of 2011 and 1st Qtr of 2012 - nowhere near 30%. First Premier actually reined in their up front charges, they used to be much higher where a $300 CL had maybe $50 to $75 available credit after up front fees plus no grace period on 36% or more APR interest. I don't care how high the expected default rate is, that's just plain Mod Cut of their captive customer base.  


It just depends: I can assure you C1 isn't the bottom of the barrel as far as subprime lending goes... they wouldn't even touch me for an auto loan for example  As stated, I've worked at a subprime lender who saw that default rate (it was actually higher) during one of their periods, I didn't just pull that percentage out of the wind.

 

There's a long way between any of these cards and their costs, vs. the Pay Day Loan places... and if you've ever done the math on those, they are way, way worse than anything FP has ever done.  As a result, FP could start lending down towards that strata, vis a vis similar to places like Cashcall with their high APR's, but you compare this to the fees that some places charge, which result in 300%+ APR's, and there's still a lot to be said for those for people in those situations.  Plus, FP (and even Cashcall) report to the bureaus, so if you *do* use them responsibly, that helps your credit reports and the resulting scores, and can get you out of the hole that some folks (including myself) wound up miring themselves in.

 

Starting Score: EQ 561, TU 567, EX 599* (12/30/11, EX lender pull 12/29/11)
Current Score: EQ 04 673, EQ 8 707, TU 720, EX 702* (09/02/14, EX older)
Goal Score: 700 on EQ '04 (01/01/15)


Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge
Senior Contributor
drkaje
Posts: 3,492
Registered: ‎07-25-2008
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

@ Pipeguy,

 

How is it a captive customer base?


Starting Score: 675
Current Score: EX 753 FICO, EQ 737FICO, TU 738
Goal Score: 776 FICO


Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Established Contributor
pipeguy
Posts: 716
Registered: ‎10-31-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees


drkaje wrote:

@ Pipeguy,

 

How is it a captive customer base?


The "captive" customer base is those that must use a lender like First Premier to get any "credit card". I posted a link yesterday from American Banker that talks about the First Premier business model.

 

http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-in-the-News/Interesting-Look-at-First-Premier-MasterCard-Busi...

 

From the article:

 

Thanks to the preliminary injunction, First Premier offers on the Internet three different unsecured cards that, for a $300 line, require a $95 "processing fee" paid before issuance, plus a $75 annual fee (25% of the credit line) for the first year, charged to the card, and a 36% APR.  Hence, using the full line for one year you pay a total of $278, more than 90% of the line.

 

Why anyone would pay $278 in fees-interest for a $22 usable credit line is beyond me, but there seems to be a customer base that is so captive to their bad credit rating that they accept these terms over a secured card.

*** Remember the Tallyman because he sure remembers you ***
Frequent Contributor
Dadaluma83
Posts: 364
Registered: ‎08-23-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees

I have no problem with fees charged by First Premier. The only people who would pay or go for a card like that are people who's credit has hit rock bottom and not even Cap 1 would touch them.

 

Sometimes you gotta just pull yourself up by your bootstraps and bite the bullet with FP for 6 months to a year until you can at least move on to something more reasonable to rebuild, like a secured card from Cap 1.

FICO Scores: TU: 768 (Jan 2012), EQ: 755 (Jan 2012 Lender pull)
Senior Contributor
drkaje
Posts: 3,492
Registered: ‎07-25-2008
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees


pipeguy wrote:

drkaje wrote:

@ Pipeguy,

 

How is it a captive customer base?


The "captive" customer base is those that must use a lender like First Premier to get any "credit card". I posted a link yesterday from American Banker that talks about the First Premier business model.

 

http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-in-the-News/Interesting-Look-at-First-Premier-MasterCard-Busi...

 

From the article:

 

Thanks to the preliminary injunction, First Premier offers on the Internet three different unsecured cards that, for a $300 line, require a $95 "processing fee" paid before issuance, plus a $75 annual fee (25% of the credit line) for the first year, charged to the card, and a 36% APR.  Hence, using the full line for one year you pay a total of $278, more than 90% of the line.

 

Why anyone would pay $278 in fees-interest for a $22 usable credit line is beyond me, but there seems to be a customer base that is so captive to their bad credit rating that they accept these terms over a secured card.


A credit rating is based upon ones payment history and financial decisions.

 

Rebuilding, like comedy, isn't always pretty. I started back with a card from 5th/3rd Bank, co-branded through a student loan company. It was pretty ugly, LOL!

 

I'm not disagreeing about the rates being crazy but we pretty much put ourseles in the position to be taken advantage of. Without some of those companies people would just have to wait until everything aged off before getting credit again.


Starting Score: 675
Current Score: EX 753 FICO, EQ 737FICO, TU 738
Goal Score: 776 FICO


Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Moderator Emeritus
webhopper
Posts: 7,230
Registered: ‎09-16-2011
0

Re: Not Good - Consumer agency backs down on card fees


drkaje wrote:

pipeguy wrote:

drkaje wrote:

@ Pipeguy,

 

How is it a captive customer base?


The "captive" customer base is those that must use a lender like First Premier to get any "credit card". I posted a link yesterday from American Banker that talks about the First Premier business model.

 

http://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-in-the-News/Interesting-Look-at-First-Premier-MasterCard-Busi...

 

From the article:

 

Thanks to the preliminary injunction, First Premier offers on the Internet three different unsecured cards that, for a $300 line, require a $95 "processing fee" paid before issuance, plus a $75 annual fee (25% of the credit line) for the first year, charged to the card, and a 36% APR.  Hence, using the full line for one year you pay a total of $278, more than 90% of the line.

 

Why anyone would pay $278 in fees-interest for a $22 usable credit line is beyond me, but there seems to be a customer base that is so captive to their bad credit rating that they accept these terms over a secured card.


A credit rating is based upon ones payment history and financial decisions.

 

Rebuilding, like comedy, isn't always pretty. I started back with a card from 5th/3rd Bank, co-branded through a student loan company. It was pretty ugly, LOL!

 

I'm not disagreeing about the rates being crazy but we pretty much put ourseles in the position to be taken advantage of. Without some of those companies people would just have to wait until everything aged off before getting credit again.  Or pay everything off.. COs and all


+1


Starting Score: 08/29/2011 TU 671 EQ 674
Current Score: TU 754 EQ 694 EX 697
Wallet: NFCU Visa Sig 25k, Amex Lowes 22k, NavCheck 15k, Amex PRG, Amex Zync, Discover It 13.5k, Amazon Visa 5k
Platinum Spade Garden Club Member: App Free since 1/1/13. No more apps til who knows when?
MyFICO Fitness Goal: 800s Club!



Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

myFICO is the consumer division of FICO. Since its introduction 20 years ago, the FICO® Score has become a global standard for measuring credit risk in the banking, mortgage, credit card, auto and retail industries. 90 of the top 100 largest U.S. financial institutions use the FICO Score to make consumer credit decisions.

>> About myFICO
FICO Score - The Score that matters
Click to Verify - This site chose VeriSign SSL for secure e-commerce and confidential communications.
Fair Isaac Corporation is a BBB Accredited Financial Service in San Rafael, CA
FOLLOW US Social Media Facebook Twitter Pinterest Google+
}