No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Hi happy,
I realize the UTIL issue. All CCs are now paid off (but the 0 bals have not hit my CRs yet). Have not had a BK, but rather just stopped paying (due to inability to pay back then). As I said, most of the ‘old CCs’ (amex, citi, ba, etc.) fell off as I ‘waited out’ the 7+ yr period and lived w/o ccs as I needed some extended ‘how to manage $ properly’ courses and also, I didn’t want to fall back into the bad habits of my late teens-20s and just ‘live off credit.’ Since getting ccs in 07, I have not had any lates, over the limits, and 9/10x, all cards are paid off in full every month.
The hsbc ‘baddie’ (chargeoff) happened when I’d attempted to salvage the acct (it was part of my ‘bad cc behavior years ago’), but was unable to save it, so it went into CO. on the TU report from 10/07, it says ‘closed 4/4, date paid 2/4, pay status= charged off as bad debt/purchased by another lender.’ The high bal shows as 570; the bal shows as 0. I live in CA and the SOL is 4 yrs, so it has passed. According to TU, ‘estimated date that this item will be removed= 9/10’. Hsbc hasn’t updated my CR since 1/06 according to TU.
Asset acceptance shows up related to the HSBC and shows a bal of 1155, pay status ‘collection acct/placed for collection’ as of 7/07 (which doesn’t make sense as the card was closed in 04 from HSBC). TU says the item will be removed on 12/10.
*re HSBC/asset acceptance (and the tax lien- my ‘serious baddies’), I do not want to ‘reset the clock’ or have FICO view them as ‘new disputes’. However, I’d like to minimize their negative impact (Though most of the damage is probably already done by now credit score wise?) if possible.
*no ‘new’ baddies are on my CR from late 2006-present and I plan to keep it that way.
The car loan (2 TLs b/c the original bank was bought by another bank) show last updated as of 2002 and 2003, but the lates still show up. car loan was paid off, but I’d like to get the lates (which are from 2002-2003) removed if possible. Perhaps a GW letter will do it? I realize most of the ‘bad impact’ from the lates on the car loan is probably done, but I’d like to remove the lates if possible (but keep the TLs as they are showing up as ‘good TLs’).
Tax lien is from 2003 and another 1 (same years covered in terms of alleged tax liability) is from 2005. not sure how to deal w/'duplicate' entries w/o 'restarting the clock?' TU says it will drop in 2013, but I hope to resolve it positively before then (but that’s a longggg post, so I won’t fill that out). Midland and NCO are not on my latest TU report (they were related to other charged off ccs), so it looks like they finally dropped off (@ least for TU purposes- I am ordering the other 2 reports).
As for cap 1, I applied mainly b/c I think I may need to utilize their auto loan and/or personal loan services @ some point (looks like I may need an auto loan within the next 6-12 mos.), so I thought having a ‘relationship’ w/them would possibly help them ‘favor’ me down the road. I did the same w/BA (99/500 card). I don’t plan on applying for any more CCs as really, I do not like having CCs (they are a necessary evil- e.g., needed for hotels, plane tix, etc.). As I said, since 07 (when I got my 1st ‘new’ CCS- orchard, first premier), I’ve been MUCH better @ using them properly- low UTIL, PIF, no lates, no overlimits, etc. @ this point, I am looking for a ‘strategy’ (beyond the obvious low util, PIF, stop ‘new baddies’) to improve my scores more in 08-09. I’d like to be in the 600s and 1 day hit the 700s. I’d also like to ‘break up’ w/first premier in 2009 (just paid the annual fees, so will keep the card for 2008-early 2009) b/c I’m tired of the monthly/other high fees and by 2009, I’ll have had 2 yrs of ‘perfect’ history w/them. Same w/orchard- while they don’t charge monthly fees, they are a ‘subprime’ card, and I’d like to ‘dump’ them in 2009 if possible and try to get in w/’prime’ lenders like BA, Citibank, etc.
The hsbc ‘baddie’ (chargeoff) happened when I’d attempted to salvage the acct (it was part of my ‘bad cc behavior years ago’), but was unable to save it, so it went into CO. on the TU report from 10/07, it says ‘closed 4/4, date paid 2/4, pay status= charged off as bad debt/purchased by another lender.’ The high bal shows as 570; the bal shows as 0. I live in CA and the SOL is 4 yrs, so it has passed. According to TU, ‘estimated date that this item will be removed= 9/10’. Hsbc hasn’t updated my CR since 1/06 according to TU.
According to TU, ‘estimated date that this item will be removed= 9/10’
When trying to keep a CC many try to make payments but never become current. Do you remember if you became currect at any time before you stopped paying?
Jan payment due $100 missed
Feb $200 missed but paid $100 after the due date
March $300 paid $50
This is making payments BUT you never became current. Your DOFD would be jan/200?
If the account was closed in 4/04 then the DOFD will be before that. Another thing if TU says that it will drop in 9/2010 the DOFD would be in 2003
I would not dispute HSBC right now as they are not updating. BUT should they update then YES I would then dispute and wait for it to verify.....then send HSBC the OC letter CMRRR........I would DV the CA CMRRR at the same time I would send the past SOL letter with it.
Read the letters and make all changes needed.....just type your name do NOT sign it
CERTIFIED MAIL #: _______________________________________________________
Your Name
Your Address
YourTown,, State ZipCode
Debt Collection Company Name
Their address
Town, State ZipCode
Date:
Re: Debt Collection Company Name; Acct # Debt Collection Company #; Original Creditor Name; OC Acct #
To Whom It May Concern:
This letter is being sent to you in response to a notice sent to me on DATE. Be advised that this is a notice sent pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 (b) that your claim is disputed and validation is requested.
This is NOT a request for “verification” or proof of my mailing address, but a request for FULL MEDIA VALIDATION made pursuant to the above named Title and Section. I respectfully request that your offices provide me with competent evidence that (a) the account is valid, (b) the amount allegedly owed is accurate, and (c) I have a contractual obligation to pay Debt Collection Company Name for this alleged debt.
All of the following MUST be provided to adequately validate the authenticity of the alleged debt AND provide proof of my contractual obligation to Debt Collection Company Name for this alleged debt:
• Signed credit application between myself and the original creditor
• Copies of all signed vouchers from the date account was opened until default
• Copies of all statements from the date account opened until default
• Proof of the statute of limitations
• Proof of agreement that you were hired by the Original creditor (creditor as defined by the FDCPA) or
• A copy of the contract Debt Collection Company Name purchased the alleged debt.
• If the alleged debt was purchased, provide a copy of an agreement between Debt Collection Company Name and myself, signed by me, stating that I have a contractual responsibility to Debt Collection Company Name for the alleged debt
• Provide proof that Debt Collection Company Name is bonded/Licensed for debt collecting in the State of Your State
Be advised that failing to provide ALL of the media requested to validate the alleged debt will invalidate any and all claims Debt Collection Company Name is asserting regarding this alleged debt. If Debt Collection Company Name can NOT provide all of the validation media requested above, ALL collection efforts MUST be stopped and the account MUST be DELETED from the Debt Collection Company Name. If you can NOT validate your claim, you can NOT, by law, collect on it, or SELL it to another collection agency. Also, reporting a debt to the credit reporting agencies that can not be validated is a violation of the FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act), and carries a $2500 fine to be paid to me. I have two years to decide if I want to pursue this matter. PLEASE GIVE THIS MATTER THE ATTENTION IT DESERVES.
If your offices are able to provide all of the validating media as requested, I will require at least 30 days to investigate this information, and during such time, all collection activity must cease and desist.
I am also stating, in writing, that no telephone contact be made by your offices. If your offices attempt telephone communication with me, including but not limited to computer generated calls and calls or correspondence sent to or with any third parties, it will be considered harassment, and I will have no choice but to file suit. All future communications with me MUST be done in writing and sent to the address noted in this letter by United States Postal Service.
Best Regards,
Your Name
TYPED only
PAST SOL