lets say that A.) CA own's the account, then chances are they would have all documentation from the OC to be able to validate?
or B.) if they were assigned the account but b/c the OC isn't around anymore, then chances of them being able to provide all documentation is slim & probably wont validate?
My best guess is that if I ask for a copy of the contract that i signed and dated and also ask for all proof that they tried to contact me, any collection efforts, then most likely since the OC isnt around anymore then they couldn't validate.
They would have to get a copy of my contract from the OC, who isnt around.
Lets say that i request a copy of my contract, copies of all rent reciepts, copies of all collections bills sent out(never once recieved anything in the mail only 1 phone call threatning to sue, never heard anything again after that), and they send back a letter only giving lets say collection letters but cant provide compies of rent reciepts &/or copy of original contract, then that would not be defined as a vaild validation right? In that case I would write the CRA'a and tell them they couldnt properly validate and to delete the account.
Am I getting this right? Just want to make sure I get this right b/c i never dealt w/ a CA whose client doesnt exist anylonger.
FICO2/10=EQ= 564
FICO2/10=6012/10-FACO TU 578;3/10=643