Reply
Senior Contributor
Posts: 4,635
Registered: ‎03-11-2007
0

Congress Upset Over Lack of FACTA Enforcement

 
June 21, 2007 - The FTC and the FED got a grilling from members of Congress this week as they testified at a hearing about enforcement failures of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). Elected representatives wanted to know why all of the provisions in FACTA, which gives a variety of rights to consumers, have not been implemented. Those asking the questions were especially concerned that provisions of FACTA that are designed to help consumers straighten out errors on their credit reports.
 
One of the things that FACTA specified was that the CRAs (Experian, Equifax and Trans Union) change their customer support procedures to make it easier for consumers to address issues with their credit reports. Lawmakers at the hearing were concerned that the government was not moving fast enough to implement all of the provisions of FACTA.
 
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) said, "The problem of FED inaction is a consistent theme. So many years to accomplish a congressional task is unacceptable and ridiculous." And Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-OH) said it "was essential that consumers have an effective way to correct or reverse erroneous information."
 
But if lawmakers thought that a line of hard questions would be enough to get these federal agencies moving forward they were sadly mistaken. Instead, they started finger pointing at each other and at Congress.
 
Specifically, those testifying said that there were simply too many agencies responsible for various consumer credit regulations and that it was difficult for these various agencies to reach mutual agreements. The FED (Federal Reserve), Office of Thrift Supervision, OCC (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) and the FTC all regulate various aspects of consumer credit. 
 
Lydia Parnes, the FTC representative that testified at the hearings said that the FTC had implemented 17 out of 20 of the mandates from FACTA but she had no timetable for implementing the remaining three. And she tried to show that the FTC was being effective at enforcement by levying fines against companies that violate consumer credit laws. She specifically mentioned the agencies settlement with ChoicePoint after the company sold consumer data to identity thieves.
 
Consumer advocates at the hearings were not impressed. Evan Hendricks, publisher of the Privacy Times newsletter pointed out that fines levied against companies who violate the law have all been very small when compared to the profit those companies made through their violations. He also pointed out that the CRAs have been focused on cost cutting measures rather than on customer service. This focus has led to many of the problems consumers face today when they try to address credit report issues.
 
A staff attorney for the National Consumer Law Center, Chi Chi Wu, told congressional members that the CRAs have virtually no to change their ways and conduct real investigations when consumers file a credit dispute. She said, "They treat disputes as a nuisance, and the investigation of errors as a money drain, devoting as little resources as possible by using automation that produces formalistic results." She went on to say that "ensuring the accuracy of credit reports is ever more critical given the expanding reliance on credit scores in all financial aspects of a consumer's life. For this reason, we urge the Regulatory Agencies to consider the recommendations above and issue guidelines that have meaningful protections for consumers."
 
But how or if Congress will address these issues again is unknown. The message that the federal agencies testifying were conveying to Congress was "don't hold your breath".
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 9,252
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: Congress Upset Over Lack of FACTA Enforcement

"don't hold your breath" is right.
Thanks for the article.
Highlighted
Senior Contributor
Posts: 4,635
Registered: ‎03-11-2007
0

Re: Congress Upset Over Lack of FACTA Enforcement

Post 9/11, Congress felt the various agencies responsible weren't sufficiently cooperative and formed DHS.
 
One wonders whether this and other Congressional hearings on the subject will be enough to raise the wrath of Congress yet again.
 
Department of Consumer Credit Security
 
Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.
† Credit cards for FICO Score ranges: The score ranges are guidelines based on actual applicant approvals and having a FICO Score in a particular range does not guarantee you will be approved for credit cards recommended in that range.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.