Inq's are on our credit reports for a reason. It's actually illegal for the CRA's to remove an inquiry. That's not to say that they don't do it on occasion, but they are REQUIRED by law to notate when they supply your credit report to someone.
Do we really want to live in a credit world where the CRA's can provide your credit report to someone without some form of independent checking to make sure that they are doing it legally?
If there is an inc on your report what it really means is that the CRA has delivered your credit report to someone and personally I want to know who gets mine, and for what reason.
This is not to say that an improper inc should remain coded as a hard inc, but do we really want to spearhead a trend that allows the CSR's to simply erase history?
If we go down that road aren't we saying to them "Go ahead and provide my report to anyone that asks, just don't ding my score when you do?"
I know it's probably from an individual point of view better to get some inc's removed from reports, but what are we telling the CSR's when we do it? I think it's a dangerous precedent to set.
I certainly don't have all the answers, but I am filled with questions.
Van