Reply
Valued Member
melprieve
Posts: 39
Registered: ‎10-02-2010
0

SOL on Payday Loans in TX

Back in Feb 2007, when I was desperate, I took out a t payday loan w/Cashnet USA. They are calling me now, today, to tell me they are filing charges with the courts in the county I live in.  Is this legal?


Starting Score 10/10: 529
Current Score 12/11: 663
Goal Score: 850


Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Community Leader
Senior Contributor
laz98
Posts: 4,336
Registered: ‎09-06-2008
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

Are you asking if it's legal for them to sue you, or to threaten to sue you?

 

It seems like you would be past the SOL for Texas, but you would still have to show up to court if they did indeed sue you.

Latest scores: Walmart TU: 769. MyFICO TU: 769. DCU EQ: 755. MyFICO EQ: 780. PSECU EX: 756. MyFICO EX: 780.
Valued Member
melprieve
Posts: 39
Registered: ‎10-02-2010
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

Is it legal for them to sue me?


Starting Score 10/10: 529
Current Score 12/11: 663
Goal Score: 850


Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Community Leader
Senior Contributor
laz98
Posts: 4,336
Registered: ‎09-06-2008
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

They can sue you, but if you show up to court & use the expired SOL as a defense, then the case should be dismissed.  If you don't show up, then they can get a default judgment against you.  That's why it is imperative that you show up if you are served.

Latest scores: Walmart TU: 769. MyFICO TU: 769. DCU EQ: 755. MyFICO EQ: 780. PSECU EX: 756. MyFICO EX: 780.
Mega Contributor
RobertEG
Posts: 18,475
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

[ Edited ]

+1

Expiration of any statute of limitations on debt requires a showing before the court of the relevant date, under their state law, when the SOL period began, along with a showing of your evidence from account records of that action having occured on that date.  Often the DOFD on the OC account. 

The plaintiff can counter by contesting either the proofs provided, or by asserting that the state statute provides for a later date or reset of that date.  Simply stated, expiration of SOL must be asserted and proven in court.  Thus, they do not know if you will even raise that defense, and if so, if your interpretation is accurate.  The judge determines expiration of SOL.

 

There are, admittedly, situations where actual expiration of SOL is evident and clearly known to have expired  prior to court.  In such cases, debt collectors have been found by the court to be in violation of the FDCPA for even bringing legal action on a knowingly SOL-expired debt.  But that does not appear to be your situation, as the key is their full knowledge that SOL has expired at the time of bringing legal action.

 

If you assert and prove expiration of SOL, the judge will award summary judgment to you without further considering the case on its merits.

It is imperitive that you show in court, along with your proofs.

 

 

Valued Member
melprieve
Posts: 39
Registered: ‎10-02-2010
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

I have all of my documentation.  Thank you guys for your input and knowledge.


Starting Score 10/10: 529
Current Score 12/11: 663
Goal Score: 850


Take the FICO Fitness Challenge
Moderator
Shogun
Posts: 12,952
Registered: ‎04-15-2011
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

I believe it's only illegal in California to sue past SOL.    Now I do believe it is against the rules to threaten you with a lawsuit and not follow up with it.  Someone chime in here on this please because I'm not exactly sure.

 


Starting Score: 504

July 2013 score: EQ FICO 819, TU08 778, EX "806 lender pull 07/26/2013
Goal Score: All Scores 760+, Newest goal 800+

Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

Current scores after adding $81K in CLs and 2 new cars since July 2013
EQ:809 TU 777 EX 790 Now it's just garden time!
Mega Contributor
RobertEG
Posts: 18,475
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

Bringing legal action by a debt collector when they can be shown to have had actual knowledge that the SOL had expired has been considered, in case law, as a seperate violation of the FDCPA prohibition against taking legal action that is knowlingly unenforceable.

It is based on case law interpretation of the federal FDCPA, after first showing actual expiration of the state SOL, that they had prior knowledge of that fact when bringing legal action.

 

Not to overemphasize the legalities, as it rarely occurs that one can go to court with proof that a debt collector had actual knowledge that the SOL had expired, and nonetheless commenced legal action.  If you have proof that will withstand challenge in court, it is a legitimate counter-complaint that can be raised, possibly resulting in total judgement for the defendant.  But that is a burden that requires proof of their knowledge.  A tough one.....

 

Established Member
Hwndori
Posts: 13
Registered: ‎11-21-2012
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

[ Edited ]

I made the same mistake back in 2007 as well. The collection company that bought our charged off accounts are dirty sharks, acting like laywers (But are not) and have threatened the SAME thing to me... They have this automated system that will even state.. "There is a process server out in your area. Please be home between the hours of 2pm and 6pm or call us at XXX-XXX to schedule a time." or this female voice that says the same thing about filing charges in your county.. blah blah... They have said it to me for YEARS and never got no process server. Threaten that the sherrif's office will be at my door at 6pm so I better be home..... THREATENING me for $127

They kept calling me even AFTER by laywer faxed them over copies of my discharge..

 

I was told to report them to the FBI by my lawyer which I did...(Never heard from the since)


Starting Score: Post BK 6/20/12 (434); 11/20/12 TU:530 EX:531 EQ:534 (Lender Pull)
Current Score: 6/30/13: TU:620 EX:591 EQ: ??Moving Up!
Goal Score: 700 & Mortgage Ready
Gardening! Last App: 6/13 No Apps till 6/14 (Mortgage I hope)
Wallet: Cap One Plat $750, Rewards $500,Spark $500, Finger $350, First Premier $300, Matrix $300, Bill Me Later $250
Mega Contributor
RobertEG
Posts: 18,475
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: SOL on Payday Loans in TX

[ Edited ]

It is a violation of FDCPA 807(5) for a debt collector to make threat of legal action that either cannot legally be taken, or that they have no actual intent to take.  Lack of actual intent is hard to show, but in cases such as the one posted, might be supportable.

 

In the scenario posted, there appears to be enough evidence of threat without any reasonable intent to actually bring the threatened action.  Repeated threats followed by no filing of legal action equates, at least to me, as evidence of lack of actual intent.

 

I would file a formal complaint with the FTC for violation of FDCPA 807(5).  The debt collector must answer any resulting FTC inquiry to them, explaining their action.

The FTC can bring sanctions or legal action if they find violation.  As a practical matter, the FTC does not bring legal action on individual consumer complaints, but at the very least, the debt collector will be required to explain their actions to the FTC, and will be recorded in their files.  Repeated consumer complaints for similar violation might spur the FTC to take legal action, either by way of sanction or suit.

 

 


myFICO is the consumer division of FICO. Since its introduction 20 years ago, the FICO® Score has become a global standard for measuring credit risk in the banking, mortgage, credit card, auto and retail industries. 90 of the top 100 largest U.S. financial institutions use the FICO Score to make consumer credit decisions.

>> About myFICO
FICO Score - The Score that matters
Click to Verify - This site chose VeriSign SSL for secure e-commerce and confidential communications.
Fair Isaac Corporation is a BBB Accredited Financial Service in San Rafael, CA
FOLLOW US Social Media Facebook Twitter Pinterest Google+
}