Reply
Valued Member
Posts: 48
Registered: ‎06-02-2007
0

Settle for less vs paid in full!

I have a judgment that was paid in full as far as I know since it was paid through the title company when we sold a house last August.  I just notice the notes in the credit reports said Settle for less amount and have a balance of $0.  It was paid in full.  I am trying to find out with the OC and CA but they are not helping at all.  The question is...If they change settle for paid in full, if that will make a difference in the scores?
Frequent Contributor
Posts: 389
Registered: ‎04-19-2007
0

Re: Settle for less vs paid in full!

I don't think so but maybe someone more knowledgeable will chime in. E!
FICO's EQ 519 EX543 TU ? 8/2014
EQ 525 EX no score,,, TU ?11/2014
EQ 576 1/2015 EX 595 1/2015
I think I can!
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 6,182
Registered: ‎03-29-2007
0

Re: Settle for less vs paid in full!

AFAIK, FICO doesn't factor the comment. A charge off is still a charge off. Your goal should be getting it removed.
 
With that said, a manual reviewer would certainly interpret "Settled for less than full balance" as a negative.
Contributor
Posts: 210
Registered: ‎04-28-2007
0

Re: Settle for less vs paid in full!

[ Edited ]
But...

Determine your credit goals and decide if the settlement being construed as a negative even matters. I've heard the "manual underwriting" case made for not doing settlements, but I've yet to see it have any negative impact on my own acquisition of credit. I've settled a few big accounts for under 50%, saving me as much as $3500 on one account. While it is true I'd rather have the account notated as "paid in full" rather than "settled for less than full balance", I have to question whether it has really affected me enough to justify spending thousands of dollars more. I just bought a house at prime and have obtained several prime credit cards all within the last 6 months, with a few settlements on record that are less than 2 years old. So, there you go. Certainly not a recommendation, just sharing my experience. :smileyhappy:

Message Edited by devhip on 06-21-2007 07:36 AM
Contributor
Posts: 210
Registered: ‎04-28-2007
0

Re: Settle for less vs paid in full!

In follow-up....after reading your post again I realize in your case much of what I commented on doesn't matter. You didn't settle, you paid the thing. So Tuscani is absolutely correct. It's inaccurate and should be disputed.
Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.