Asset Acceptance is INFAMOUS for filing suit against people even when the SOL has expired, and for not having any documentation to substantiate the debt. In fact, they are known as the "home of the $50 mystery payment". Paying on an old debt resets the SOL in most cases. If pressed, Asset will investigate and advise you that the supposed payment was a "posting error".
Do not speak with them on the phone anymore. Seek out a consumer rights attorney in your area, and give them all of the letters you have received and explain what happened. Most of these attorneys do NOT charge for an initial consultation, and will be happy to advise you as to what Asset Acceptance can or cannot do.
It is a violation of the FDCPA for a debt collector to threaten any action they do not intend to take. "I Will Recommend Legal Action" may or may not fall into this category. Often, however, a consumer rights attorney can find other violations of the FDCPA. If they take your case, they will probably do so on a contingency basis, meaning they will get paid when the collection agency settles the lawsuit.
Again, the best thing to do is talk to an attorney. At a minimum, you will at least then know what your options are and what the possible consequences may be.
I am the lead plaintiff in an FDCPA case brought against Asset Acceptance LLC in federal court. I could not have done this without the advice of a VERY GOOD consumer rights attorney.
Advice on the message boards is OK, but having the advice of an attorney in your area is priceless. And, even if you legitimately owe the debt, once Asset finds out that you are going to fight tooth and nail, they will most likely move on to the next victim. They are a business after all, and they do not make money by fighting cases in court. They thrive on "default" judgments where the debtor does not show up. For example, if you are sued and do not raise the SOL objection, they win - the judge will not raise the objection for you.
It might cost $1,000 or so to hire an attorney to defend your case, but if it gets dismissed, that is CHEAP!
Asset was once a debt purchasing pioneer, and was very much above board in everything they did. Now, however, the original owners have retired, and the businessmen running the company are willing to take certain risks the original owners would not have taken. If you sue 10 people for debt that is outside the SOL, odds are that only ONE will show up and raise the objection. That means that you now have NINE default judgments that you can execute on after 30 days have passed (after 30 days, these are "set in stone" for the most part.
Do NOT FALL INTO THEIR TRAP! Get a LAWYER ASAP!!!
Just my 2 cents...
Jeff
(17 years in the collections industry with an emphasis on litigation)