No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:
@cliccmade wrote:Why pay rent when you can own? Makes no sense. Buy a house asap and invest in yourself. Anyone saying anything else is just silly.
What's silly is making overly broad statements like that. There are many situations where renting is superior to buying, especially if it's short term, or if there's great rent control in your area, or if you don't have the credit or other financial necessities to purchase a home. It's a big decision that each person has to make for themselves after a careful consideration of all of the factors. Why do you think myFICO has a "is it better to rent or buy" calculator on their site?
@cliccmade wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
@cliccmade wrote:Why pay rent when you can own? Makes no sense. Buy a house asap and invest in yourself. Anyone saying anything else is just silly.
What's silly is making overly broad statements like that. There are many situations where renting is superior to buying, especially if it's short term, or if there's great rent control in your area, or if you don't have the credit or other financial necessities to purchase a home. It's a big decision that each person has to make for themselves after a careful consideration of all of the factors. Why do you think myFICO has a "is it better to rent or buy" calculator on their site?
There is no situation where renting is superior to owning. If your paying 1000 for rent you might as well be paying that 1000 towards a mortgage. Otherwise its considered throwing your money away. Why? Because you making your landlord rich. Anyone with any common sense would prefer to own versus rent. Its comes down to if you meet the guidelines ownership and if you do you will own 9 times out of 10.
@Anonymous wrote:
As Suze Orman always says, money is an emotional issue, and we can really see this by the tone of the responses to my original post. Although not directed at any one person, several posters have taken my suggestion to WAIT quite literally. Here's the 411 on my home purchase in February: I got sick and lost my job about 4 years ago and had some very bad credit issues; thanks to this forum, I was able to clean up my credit and went from about a 490 to 675 in about 3 years. While I was cleaning up my credit, I was also saving -- and I was able to make a 80/20 mortgage in February (primarily because I purchased a home that was only 1.5x my income). I was able to save money because I ate a lot of mac & cheese. The seller paid most of the closing costs, so I was able to keep a few thousand in savings. The only items I bought post-closing (paid in cash) was a refrigerator, a washer, and a dryer. I have no credit card debt and have paid off my car loan. My mortgage is my only debt. By the way, I am a single mom with a son and 3 large dogs. I would love to buy some new furniture, but I'm putting that off and making do with what I have. Everything seems to be going great, and my new home is right on mass transit line, so I drive less than 20 miles per week. As I said before, it's as if the stars were aligned when I purchased the home. HOWEVER, IF I KNEW THEN WHAT I KNOW NOW, I would have WAITED to purchase a home. As perfect as my home is for me, I'm scared to death of what is to come in the next few months. I'm scared to death because I work for lawyers in corporate finance and securities. I can't give you any specifics because of client confidentiality, but what I'm about to tell you is the absolute truth: THERE IS GOING TO BE A MAJOR MARKET CRASH IN THE COMING MONTHS AND THEN WE WILL BE HEADED INTO A DEPRESSION. MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE GOING TO LOSE THEIR JOBS. The credit crisis is MUCH WORSE than anyone in the mainstream media is letting on. The Fed's bailout of Bear Stearns wasn't so much a bailout of Bear Stearns as it was propping up JPMorgan. (By allowing JPMorgan to purchase Bear Stearns at such low prices, JPMorgan was able to pump up its "book reserves" and prevent a run on the reserves of JPMorgan when the markets opened that Monday. It's not talked about in the mainstream media, but the Fed postponed the stock market crash for about 6 months. If you look at the Fed's current financial reserves, it no longer has the money to bail out other banks, which is why Citibank is laying off 70,000 bankers around the world this week. With no reserves to prop up other banks as it did JPMorgan, the only options available to the Fed are (a) allowing major banks to fail or (b) start printing cash which will inevitably lead to hyperinflation.) There's so much to tell, that I can't even begin. So, I would just advise you to look at all kinds of information for yourself. You don't have to go to conspiracy theory sites. Just go to mainstream media: The Financial Times of London or the Economist. What was so shocking to me when I revisited this site this week was the total lack of concern about the coming economic crisis -- even though the Royal Bank of Scotland and JPMorgan both issued dire warnings to their investors this past week to take their investments out of equity (stocks) and put their reserves in CASH. What does this tell you that two of the biggest banks in the world are telling their major clients to get out of the stock market? It means that they are expecting the stock market to crash and, just like in 1930-1933, CASH WILL BE KING and debt will be an albatross around your neck. If my posts offended, I am truly sorry, but I don't think anyone is doing anyone else a favor by sugarcoating the truth. And the time to sugarcoat the truth has long since passed. Yes, I bought my home 4 months ago and maybe I'll be ok and maybe I won't. I just would feel a lot safer right now if I had $30,000 in the bank rather than invested in real estate. And what offends ME is that there are people who still want a shortcut to financial security rather than taking the time to do the work necessary for true financial security. But of course none of this may matter in 6 months anyway. There may be no financial security for anyone. (And, by the way, to the poster who said that things were "picking up" in California -- those sales figures are the result of short sales and foreclosures where banks are desperate to get any amount for property. These sales are not a true indication of a "traditional" upturn in the economy.)