No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
First ofa lkl I mentioned in another thread that NFCU had offered me a modification of my existing mortgage to use a lower interst rate (and therefore payment) for the remainder of the term. There was a lot of misundertanding on this. Some seemed to think that I was being offerend one of the types of relief mentioned in the subject line and other told me to make sure what type of refi they repoort (it is not a refi at all)
What NFCU told me they would do was to accomplish the mod and to report to the CRAs my new payment and nothing else just as they might do after the annual escow adjustment. Many were still skeptical some told me it was not worth the cjange in payments (almost $170 a month) anda few others thought I would be shocked by the fees (no fee, no credit scheck, no points no anything)
Well today I was able to check the EQ and TU reports from this site and they reflect the new data. MY scores are unchangfed. In both cases the only thing that seems to report is the new payment. Nothing else. Admitedly I do not see as much as a potential creditor might see but there is certainly no reason to believe that NFCU reported this any differently than they said they would.
So if you are offered the same thing ask plenty of questions and check your scores and reports before an afterwards but if my case is any example it is quite possible that they will do exactly as they said and it will not affect you negatively---although the $170 a month is a nice positive effect.
if you havc questions or comments this is the place for them but I am pleased with the results.
That's great news. You are fortunate, because a few years ago the Consumer Data Industry Association established reporting guidelines for modified loans that clearly had a negative impact on the credit scores of some persons who had received modifications. However, these guidelines are inconsistently applied, which has benefited you.
Interestingly, as of a couple years ago the HAMP modifications were not expected to have a negative impact on credit scores, because they were assigned a new comment code that was distinct from that used for non-HAMP modifications. Since there was no statistical information about the forward-going credit history of persons with HAMP modifications, the comment code could not be incorporated into the FICO scoring model. I'm not sure if this has changed since then.
Remember though NFCU did not report ANYTHING except the new payment. theu did not specifically say that a smodification occirred. Or at least that is what they said and nothing in the record disproves that. that is why i was willing to do this----that and the monthly savings.
I am a bit amazed if HAMP and HASP modifications did not result in anything negative. Everything I have reead says they did----and since you have to be behinf in payments to participate in those programs it does not make sense that they did not carry with them a penalty.
Here is onew article tht says participants were hurt ---and insists that most of them had their accounts mnarked with an existing code not a new one.
http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/how-loan-modifications-impact-credit-scores/
@geronimo2008 wrote:I am a bit amazed if HAMP and HASP modifications did not result in anything negative. Everything I have reead says they did----and since you have to be behinf in payments to participate in those programs it does not make sense that they did not carry with them a penalty.
Here is onew article tht says participants were hurt ---and insists that most of them had their accounts mnarked with an existing code not a new one.
http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/05/how-loan-modifications-impact-credit-scores/
This is an example of how the comment codes and reporting guidelines are inconsistently applied. In theory, if HAMP participants are reported using the CN code, then at the time the article was written, it wouldn't have had any impact on credit scores. The AC code, however, has a clear negative effect - the wording associated with AC is something like "paying as part of a modfied or reduced payment plan".
Eligibility for HAMP, according to the original guidelines set forth by the government, did not require borrowers to be behind in their payments in order to qualify. However, individual lenders would establish their own guidelines as to whom they would consider for modification. I've heard that in some cases, a borrower wouldn't get any attention unless they were actually behind. But technically speaking, you do not have to be delinquent to qualify for HAMP.
Every site I see about HAmp says something like this
https://www.hmpadmin.com/portal/programs/hamp.jsp
Technically you are correct. One way to be eligible would be to be behind in payments. the other way is to be in imminent danger of default.
Yep, that's what I have seen as well. There are some lenders who have their own guideline overlays (kind of like the way some FHA lenders will use stricter criteria) that require a borrower to be late. When the program first came out, there was a lot of confusion and negative effects that resulted from misunderstanding about the guidelines. Some borrowers were told that they had to be late, so they intentionally let their payments lapse. They applied for HAMP, got denied, and were left with no modification and a lower credit score.
The wording of the guidelines you have referenced have definitely been tightened from they way they were a couple years ago. Back then, I don't believe there was an "imminent default" clause. It was technically open to any borrower - delinquent, distressed, or not - who had no other options to refinance, either because of a loss in home value or a worsened DTI.
The original guidelines from 2009
Again slightly more lenient but they still indicate a financial problem
Which mortgages are eligible for HAMP?
To qualify for the HAMP, mortgages must meet the following requirements:
I know this thread got sidetracked intoa discussion about the impact of other types of mortgage modifications. It's original intent was to discuss the outcome of a mod I accepted in spite of advice from some on the forum that it might be viewed as one of the other types of mods.
In any event in at least this case the modification does not seem to have adversely affected me. The same question was brought up in another tread and I just wanted others to know that it is not necessarily bad----though I agree with the counsel given to me here to aska lot of questions first.