@Anonymous wrote:
@Anonymous wrote:
Billing statements and contract came from
a) Online Dispute
Not from my request for DV? FYI: the day i sent in the TX TFC 392 Request (nov 21st), the very next day i got a response.
if indeed USPS could work that super efficent/fast/e-speed i would agree.
i reserve my right to disagree with your assessment?
Irrelevant. Its a little like complaining you didn't get a refund because they sent a check out a week before you asked for it.
BTW what would IRS do if you were due a refund and all they had was
a) an address to send refund or
b) a bank Acct#/ Routing # provided on tax filing.
what do you think ? You still get your refund check dont you? Just wierd how and what you asked for and what they thought they had to do? hmmmmm. is it an apples to apples comparison or not really? online Dispute v/s DV you get your response love it or leave it.
so if information like a DV/Online Dispute was provided seperately does each carry its own or you can combine and say " hey you got it" didnt you? Now stay put..
come to think of it, if my DV was TX specific with TX TFC 392.202 relevancy, would that change anything?
Why ever bother with mailing costs of sending DV's (especially TX 392 DV) when you can just go online dispute it and be responded to. Save's CA's money & Debtor also..You must actually decide way ahead of time what exactly is in the debtor's best interest? is it? online or mailing. just dont do both please.
Can you imagine two different CA names reporting at different bureaus but same address? lol Allied Collection Services aka Resident Collect Inc? lol one having an active surety bond in TX and one doesn't?
if that refund check was made out to.....????????
omg lmao
PS: This post is written as to appear funny in my perspective? no punt intended. Mods please dont gang up on me.
