Reply
Established Member
Posts: 18
Registered: ‎03-29-2010
0

Creditor Question for all

I had a utility bill that was sold to another creditor (ICC). I paid ICC two years ago but I notice they are reporting it as a (CO) chargoff on all three reports. Are they allowed to do this? It seems as though the only creditor would be able to say it was a charge off but I'm not sure. Any advice?

 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,896
Registered: ‎03-30-2012
0

Re: Creditor Question for all

Do you have proof that it was paid? I'd maybe send them a letter reminding them that it was paid and asking them if they could just remove it.

Scores 1/12/2014: TU FICO: 660 | EQ FICO: 665 | EX AMEX FICO: TBD

In my new wallet: American Express Green EMV: PSL $2000 | BankAmericard Cash Rewards Visa EMV: $2500 | BarclayCard Rewards Average: $2000 | Travelocity Rewards AMEX: $1050 | Discover IT: $1500 | Amazon Rewards Visa: $1500 | Chase Freedom: $1500 | Sportsman's Guide Visa: $3000 | Capital One QuicksilverOne MasterCard: $1600 | Target: $700 | J.Crew $9550
Established Member
Posts: 18
Registered: ‎03-29-2010
0

Re: Creditor Question for all

Yes I have documentation of all correspondence with them. Plus I have copies of the money orders I sent them.

Mega Contributor
Posts: 19,537
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: Creditor Question for all

Was your payment for less than the full amount of the debt?

If you settle for less, the debt is, from the consumer's perspective, paid.  No more debt.

But the owner of the debt has to deal with the formerly collectible asset of the entire debt in their accounting ledger.

Accepting less than the full amount requires them to account for the difference.  No longer a receivable asset, so it is a loss.

I see nothing improper in accounting for the loss by reporting it as such, and obtaining a tax benefit for the loss.

However, if you paid in full prior to their doing a charge-off, that is a no-no, as their would have been no delinquent debt at the time of their charge-off of that asset.

 

Unfortunate that they choose to report their accounting to the CRA, as I agree that is a bit chinsy, but I dont see any prohibition against it.

I have a problem with the reporting of any charge-off to a CRA as a black-mark against a consumer, as it is an accounting measure that does not relate to what the consumer still owes or ultimately pays, but the fact is that a charge-off is reportable.

 

 

 

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions based on Experian or Equifax data (additional FICO® Score versions based on TransUnion data are not currently available on myFICO.com). Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.