No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@Anonymous wrote:
If that box is check it means they have a paper and if they are not including that paper then this debt is invalded.
First, does is this logic flawed?
Second, if they really have screwed up, then what do I do now?
Sorry, but you're not the one who gets to decide if a debt is valid or not...so, your logic may be flawed.
Is this in the form of a judgment already?
@Anonymous wrote:
I wanted to just get a collection paid off and off my report. I offered Hunter Warfield a pay in full to delete from report. So they instead validated the debt, and found about 400 more to tack on. What they sent to me was a copy of my lease. The lease covers everything that was signed and agreed to by me and my wife. At the end of this lease it talks about what is included with this lease. It gives a bunch of blank boxes and checks ones that was discussed and talked about. One that was checked was the invintory and damge listing that me and my wife filled out and submitted to the apartmentswhen we moved in. However in the forms that the CA sent to me to validate this debt didnt provide that paper. If that box is check it means they have a paper and if they are not including that paper then this debt is invalded.
First, does is this logic flawed?
Second, if they really have screwed up, then what do I do now?
Thanks.
Did you send a DV letter to them certified?
Are you prepared to sue them under these conditions?
I would suggest contacting a local attorney, laws differ state to state.
Most attorneys will offer a first consult for free.
Check and see what your state has, about landlord/tenant laws.
Good Luck to you.
The statute does not explicitly require debt validation by the debt collector to be accompanied by documentation. Assertions that their validation is inadequate would require interpretation of the sufficiency of their verification by a judge. They provided the bare-bones statutorty requirement of obtaining verification from the creditor.
The factual determination of accuracy of the debt or of their verification would, in my opinion, be issues to pursue in court, not under the FDCPA or FCRA.
Their procedures aren't legal processes for decidiing contested matter of fact.
+1 you should bring them to court I bet they back down.