No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@RobertEG wrote:It's not necessarily the first late.
It is the first late in the most recent chain of delinquency that preceded the collection.
If you were 30-late, brought the account back into good-standing, and then had a new 30-late, DOFD would be the new one.
Thank you for clarifying!
If any information appears in your credit report that you can assert was never authorized by you, then you can make use of the FCRA identity theft process to have it blocked from your credit report, and to obtain any records in possession of the creditor that allege to show that you did authorize the account/transactions
A simply statment asserting accounttransaction not mine or not authorized by me is not adequate.
You must be willing to ut that statement into a sworn police report, which carries criminal penalties for any knowingly false statements.
By asserting account/transaction not mine, you are essentailly asserting that if the creditor has any such authorization, it must have been provided by soneone else using your identity.
By sending a copy of the police report to the CRA, along with a statement that you never authorized the account and with proof of your identity, the CRA must then block all information realted to the identity theft from your credit report. See FCRA 605B.
Additionally, you can send a copy of the police report to the creditor, and request all business records in their possession pertaining to the identity theft information
See FCRA 609(e). That will provide information that can be used to then attempt to resolve the issue of the debt itself.