Reply
New Contributor
Posts: 64
Registered: ‎12-01-2011
0

First Premier Charge Off reporting lates

I had a First Premier account charged off back in November of 2007. I started receiving notices from First National Collection Agency (?) at the first of the year. I called First Premier and they told me they no longer had the account. The CA was not reporting on my CBR, so I agreed to settle with them in March in hopes they would not show up on CBR.  Within a few weeks, the original First Premier charge off was updated to show settled, and I got a nice score bump (utilization went down).  I have not seen my EQ report since then (had to cancel scorewatch for a bit), but today I reactivated scorewatch and was surprised when it said one of the negative factors affecting my score was recent lates. First Premier apparently went back and changed every month prior to March to show 120+ late. My score has stayed about the same since March, even though I have added some credit cards (only 1 in March) and a collection fell off.  I have not had any late payments on anything since the original First Premier charge off in 2007. Can they do that? If they sold to CA can they continue to report late? Seems a bit fishy to me.

Starting Score: 539 EQ 11/1/2011
Current Score: 648 EQ SW , 670 TU SW, 654 EX (MTG Pull 8/19/2013)

**It's a marathon not a sprint**
New Contributor
Posts: 52
Registered: ‎09-20-2012
0

Re: First Premier Charge Off reporting lates

First Premiere is complete scumbags. I had a deal where they are continually rolling over a late payment showing that I've had recent lates even after I settled with the collection agency. I have worked throught the credit bureaus with no success. I worked through the BBB and they did amend the mistake. I felt like they owed me for making me chase them for four months and asked them to remove, but they are so rightous and they refused. My goal is to see them blacklisted on this forum and have members stop using them as part of their rebuild. There is strength in numbers.

Epic Contributor
Posts: 20,109
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: First Premier Charge Off reporting lates

The fact that they took and reported a charge-off is immaterial to continued delinquency on the debt, as a charge-off removes the debt from their internal assets, and not from consumer oblitation to pay the entire debt.

Thus, provided they still owned the debt, it was permissible for them to continue to report your level of continued delinquency with them.

When did they actually sell the debt?  Once sold, no, you no longer can have reportable lates with them, but they can go back and update delinquencies while the debt was still owed to them.

 

If they sold the debt prior to its payment, which is apparently the case, then they were required at that time tohave reported $0 debt balance on their account.  that terminates their obligation.  Later settlement with the new owner would then become irrelevant to them, so I suspect their reporting was one of having sold the debt, not of its later settlement with the new owner.

Moderator
Posts: 13,597
Registered: ‎04-15-2011
0

Re: First Premier Charge Off reporting lates

Yes, they can report the lates up until the time it was sold to the CA.  Why they went back and reported all those lates?  Seems sometimes it's out of spite.  The unfortunate part is, it's not inappropriate.  Send GWs to First Premier.  Good Luck.



Starting Score: 504




July 2013 score:
EQ FICO 819, TU08 778, EX "806 lender pull 07/26/2013
Goal Score: All Scores 760+, Newest goal 800+
Take the myFICO Fitness Challenge

Current scores after adding $81K in CLs and 2 new cars since July 2013
EQ:809 TU 777 EX 790 Now it's just garden time!
New Contributor
Posts: 64
Registered: ‎12-01-2011
0

Re: First Premier Charge Off reporting lates

I guess I need to find out when it was actually sold to the collection agency. I know it was sold to them before March, because the CA sent me a few notices before I ever contacted them. FP is reporting 120+ lates up until April, so that is definitely incorrect.  I think I am going to write a letter to FP requesting the dates it was sold to CA and go from there.  I have two paid judgements from (2008 and 2009) and this FP account as my only negatives left. I will likely have to wait for the judgements to age off since I have no good reason for them to be vacated, but it least there is already a few years since they happened so their impact on my score is maybe not as bad. Now this FP crap makes it look like I have been super late recently which is probably really hurting my score. Ugh.

Starting Score: 539 EQ 11/1/2011
Current Score: 648 EQ SW , 670 TU SW, 654 EX (MTG Pull 8/19/2013)

**It's a marathon not a sprint**
Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.