No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
I am a new member of this forum. Just 1 night's reading, I've learned so many new concepts that gave much hope. At the same time, I'm somewhat uncertain which way I should go to improve my credit, and would truly appreciate your suggestions.
My FICO’s around 650, and it's largely because of my negligence and bad habit. I had never any finance trouble, and credit utilization has been below 10% even when collections occurred. But somehow I managed to get 2 collections, all less than $100 (utility bills). I simply neglected the mails when moving (dumped "junk mails") or simply because I was stupid. Not knowing I could use GW/PFD letter, I have paid the collection in full a 1 or 2 years back. I recently had another collection of an original debt of $8 + 3 late fees, a total of around $70 dollars. What would be my best bet to improve my credit standing in a fairly short time? In my situation, would I likely succeed with a GW letter? Is there any way to persuade a lender that the FICO score doesn't truly indicate my finance situation?
pjxf99 wrote:Also, yes, a paid collection will hurt you, and probably keep you from automatic approvals.
JShidell wrote:
pjxf99 wrote:
Also, yes, a paid collection will hurt you, and probably keep you from automatic approvals.
Why is that? I never understand why a paid collection would hurt you more. Aren't you suppose to pay?To my understand most lenders prefer you to pay off your collections. When I was trying to shop around for lenders about a year ago to see where I stood, they told me that I would need to pay off all my collections/charge-off accounts before I could even be considered. They wouldn't even deal with me if I had unpaid collections.v/rJames
cheddar wrote:
JShidell wrote:Why is that? I never understand why a paid collection would hurt you more. Aren't you suppose to pay?To my understand most lenders prefer you to pay off your collections. When I was trying to shop around for lenders about a year ago to see where I stood, they told me that I would need to pay off all my collections/charge-off accounts before I could even be considered. They wouldn't even deal with me if I had unpaid collections.v/rJameswrote:Also, yes, a paid collection will hurt you, and probably keep you from automatic approvals.Why is that? I never understand why a paid collection would hurt you more. Aren't you suppose to pay?To my understand most lenders prefer you to pay off your collections. When I was trying to shop around for lenders about a year ago to see where I stood, they told me that I would need to pay off all my collections/charge-off accounts before I could even be considered. They wouldn't even deal with me if I had unpaid collections.v/rJamesPaying a collection often results in the account being updated to make the collection appear more recent, which can hurt one's FICO score.While you are correct that lenders prefer to see paid collections rather than unpaid ones, FICO is indifferent to the status of a collection, and scores paid collections the same as unpaid collections. The reason for this is that FICO is intended to be a predictor of risk to the original creditor. Once an account has gone to collections, that risk has already manifested itself, and it is no comfort to the original creditor that the debt was eventually paid to a CA. FICO only cares that one avoid letting accounts go to collections in the first place, since that is where the risk to the original creditor lies.
Message Edited by cheddar on 06-11-2008 03:01 AM