No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
So i'm a couple months into my credit repair journey and BOOM! I get a letter saying one of my accounts has been placed for collection, with Accelerated Servicing Group LLC, the amount is a little over $4800. However they are saying the origional creditor on the account was Brightwater Captial LLC. I have NEVER had an account with them. However the account I am thinking this is refering to is an account I had with synchrony bank. Last I remember this account was only around $3400 so i'm wondering how much fees have been charged. Anyways they say I have 30 days to dispute the validity of the debt. So I would like to know what type of DV letter should I send them because I am unsure if this is indeed fraud. I did some searching here and what I have found has been vague. I've read somewhere that in the letter I should include tracking number in the letter? I really appreciate the wealth of knowledge this forum has. I appreciate any advice you have for me. Thank you very much in advance.
It is possible that ownership changed from the OC to a second creditor prior to the debt collector obtaining their collection authority.
The owner named in a collection ("dunning") notice need not be the original creditor.
In such cases, that is why FDCPA 809(b) also permits the consumer to additionally request, in their DV, the name of the original creditor.
A sample DV that requests both verification and the name of the OC if provided below.
Once they have provided the name of the OC, you can then determine whether you wish to file a police report and assert that you never had a debt with the named original creditor.
"This is a request for debt validation under FDCPA 809(b).
I request verification the amount of the asserted debt, an itemization of the pricipal balance and the asserted interest, and the name of the orginal creditor."
There is no basis for requiring a response within 30 days. The DV proess sets no requirment or period for response.
A timely DV invokes a cease collection bar, which remains in place until they have first provided verfication.
They can choose to delay (or never respond) without any violation.
@RobertEG wrote:There is no basis for requiring a response within 30 days. The DV proess sets no requirment or period for response.
A timely DV invokes a cease collection bar, which remains in place until they have first provided verfication.
They can choose to delay (or never respond) without any violation.
First of all thank you both for replying. Fortunately the post office was closed yesterday due to columbus day. So I still have some time to make adjustments. Robert it says in the letter they sent to me that if I responded they would have 30 days to respond to that letter.
Is there a difference between the dispute and debt validation requests?
@rmduhon wrote:
I'm not totally sure, but if they treat it as a dispute then they have 30 days to respond, which means a later validation request wouldn't be timely unless you live in a state that has advanced validation requirements
Thanks again for replying. I'm in florida if that helps. And I am wanting them to treat it as a dispute because I don't recognize the OC.
@Anonymous wrote:
@rmduhon wrote:
I'm not totally sure, but if they treat it as a dispute then they have 30 days to respond, which means a later validation request wouldn't be timely unless you live in a state that has advanced validation requirementsThanks again for replying. I'm in florida if that helps. And I am wanting them to treat it as a dispute because I don't recognize the OC.
OK, you really need to understand the difference between a "Dispute" and "Debt Validation". A dispute falls under FCRA which regulates how debts are reported to CRAs. Its purpose is to get incorrect information corrected. There must be an assertion that some portion of the reported data is not correct. If you belive a reported debt is not yours at all, there is a completely separate process for that (FCRA 605B).
Debt Validation OTOH, is under FDCPA which is the law regulating debt collection practices, and has nothing to do with the reporting of information. It requires a collector to provide you with certain information regarding the debt - its origin, the original amount and when the debt was incurred. A DV has the effect of putting a "collection bar" in place until the collector validates the debt. If it has not been reported to CRA's they are barred from doing so until they validate. If already reported, there is no requirement (under FCRA) to remove the report, but some states may have such requirements. Texas is one. I do not believe Florida has any such requirement.
If you have recieved a debt collection letter (dunning notice) and it has not been reported yet, then there is no information to dispute. You want to request Debt Validation, nothing more. Tossing a dispute into the mix merely muddies the water and confuses everyone.