cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Portfolio DV response

tag
upinflagstaff
Frequent Contributor

Re: Portfolio DV response

In today's mail I received,
"
Re: Dispute Investigation
PRA Account/Reference No: ###

In our previous letter to you, we requested that you send our company additional information pertaining to the account referenced above so that the Disputes Department could complete the investigation of the alleged dispute.

To date, we have not received this information and cannot complete the investigation.

Since we have not received this information, we are terminating the disputes investigation pertaining to this account and our company will no longer treat this account as a disputed account.

The account is being returned to the collection floor and our representatives will be instructed to pursue the outstanding balance due on this account."


So they are telling me that since they can't verify they will begin collections again? I think this needs a serious legal smackdown. There is no request for additional information (and even if there were it's their job to provide it).

What say the MyFico deities?
Message 11 of 15
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Portfolio DV response

ughhh this makes me so damm mad....the whole purpose of the dv is for THEM to provide YOU with that information proving that they can legally collect this debt.,....YES they need a effing SMACK DOWN...give it to 'em hard...
Message 12 of 15
upinflagstaff
Frequent Contributor

Re: Portfolio DV response

Here's what's going in the mail:
It's a modified follow up DV.

Re: ###
Dear Sir/Madam:
I'm sure you know, under FDCPA Section 809 (b), you are not allowed to pursue collection activity until the debt is validated. You should be made aware that in TWYLA BOATLEY, Plaintiff, vs. DIEM CORPORATION, No. CIV 03-0762 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, 2004, the courts ruled that reporting a collection account indeed is considered collection activity.

You received a request for validation from me on 08/16/08. You have not adequately responded to that request, only providing me with a date that your company purchased the alleged debt and a current balance amount. Subsequently you mailed me a letter dated 09/18/08 which includes the following passage, “In our previous letter to you, we requested that you send our company additional information pertaining to the account referenced above so that the Disputes Department could complete the investigation of the alleged dispute.” Under FDCPA it is Portfolio Recovery Associates who is required to investigate and validate an alleged debt. Further as you did not request that I provide additional information to prove your right to collect this alleged debt in that previous letter, this statement is a violation of FDCPA § 807.

While I prefer not to litigate, I will use the courts as needed to enforce my rights under the FDCPA.
I look forward to an uneventful resolution of this matter.
I request that all contact with me be in writing, and only when you can provide adequate validation of this alleged debt. To refresh your memory on what constitutes legal validation, I am giving a list of the required documentation:
Complete payment history, the requirement of which has been established via Spears v Brennan 745 N.E.2d 862; 2001 Ind. App. LEXIS 509 and
Agreement that bears the signature of the alleged debtor wherein they agreed to pay the original creditor.
Letter of sale or assignment from the original creditor to your company. (Agreement with your client that grants you the authority to collect on this alleged debt.) Coppola v. Arrow Financial Services, 302CV577, 2002 WL 32173704(D.Conn., Oct. 29, 2002) - Information relating to the purchase of a bad debt is not proprietary or burdensome. Debtor must phrase their request clearly to obtain: The source of a debt and the amount a bad debt buyer paid for plaintiff's debt, how amount sought was calculated, where in issue a list of reports to credit bureaus, and documents conferring authority on defendant to collect debt.
Intimate knowledge of the creation of the debt by you, the collection agency.
As you are already in violation, I expect all reference to this account be deleted from my credit report, as this entry and any update of such entry will be considered another violation. You have 5 days from the receipt of this letter to remove this account from any and all reporting agencies, or a complaint to the FTC will be immediately filed for each and every violation from 08/16/08 until this issue is resolved. It is common knowledge that your company often violates these laws and I have no doubt that if I choose to litigate that you will be held liable for your actions. It is my hope that you will comply with the law in order to avoid the hassle.
Thank You,


I have a busy morning, so I will mail this tomorrow. I have read that these guys are bottom feeders and I won't have any problem with taking them to court.

Message Edited by upinflagstaff on 09-29-2008 07:09 AM
Message 13 of 15
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Portfolio DV response

Make sure you highlight the section where you say "in your previous letter..." and the info you quote from their letter... it will help get their attention that this is not just another form letter.
Message 14 of 15
upinflagstaff
Frequent Contributor

Re: Portfolio DV response

I may reorganize the letter so that my customization is at the top.

I have a slight suspicion that they will respond that they no longer have the account. Within days of the date of their letter a hard pull hit my Experian report from "Consumer Recovery Associates" with phone calls to my mom and to me. I sent them the non-PP letter. The address for CR Associates is about 10 miles from PRA according to Google I'm assuming that PRA transfered to CRA... and it begins again.
Message 15 of 15
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.