Reply
New Member
Posts: 7
Registered: ‎11-04-2010
0

Questions on disputing charge offs and PFD

Hello all,

 

I am brand new to this forum and just yesterday began with credit clean up after a discharged bankruptcy in 2005 and unfortunate lay off for almost the past two years. My first question is this: I have alot of accounts that are on my report that are showing as charged off and derogatory but I do not have record of these accounts. I mailed in disputes for these accounts to all 3 of the CRA's. Is it reasonable to expect the CRA's to do a throrough investigation or am I being naive in expecting this derogatory accounts to be deleted?

 

My other question is this: I have 8 collection accounts ranging in age from 5 yrs to 1 yr of age. I'm not quite positive of the amount that I do rightfully owe so I'm wondering if I should dispute/validate them before I send letters to the CA asking for PFD. The second part of this question is that I've been doing alot of research on PFD and have seen the majority of sources advocate an offer of no more than 25% of the debt owed with the thought process being that these CA are have only paid 7 cents on the dollar at most for these old accounts so even collecting 25% is a handsome profit for the CA's. Any thoughts or people who have had the same problems/experiences?

 

Anything information would be much appreciated!

Thanks

Angela

Epic Contributor
Posts: 20,525
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: Questions on disputing charge offs and PFD

In my opinion, you get a tthird rate investigation when you dispute through a CRA.  They use something called their automated e-Oscar process to record your dispute, which essntially dilutes the reasons for your dispute to a three-digit dispute code.  They can add a short comment, but they rarely forward all of the suppoirting  information you provide on to the creditor/CA you are disputing.  The CRA is just an unnecessary middle-man in the dispute process.

As of 7/1/2010, consumers can now totally bypass the CRA, and use the new direct dispute process, thus disputing directly with the party who reported the disputed information to the consumer credit file.  See FCRA 623(a)(8) and 16 CFR 660.4  That cuts out the CRA, and ensures that all relevant information goes directly to the party who is the subject of the dispute.

I would never dispute through a CRA.

Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.
† Credit cards for FICO Score ranges: The score ranges are guidelines based on actual applicant approvals and having a FICO Score in a particular range does not guarantee you will be approved for credit cards recommended in that range.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.