Using Lexington Law

[ABC123TLC]

Lexington Law just got Transunion complely clean

Up to  686 Fico (going to call barclay and recon last limit)

Amex Account (paid in full / collection status)

and a 

Collection from a student loan (conserve)

I have tried myself to get rid of them, to no avail  

[cem13]

How long did it take?

---

@tlclindac wrote:

Lexington Law just got Transunion complely clean

Up to  686 Fico (going to call barclay and recon last limit)

Amex Account (paid in full / collection status)

and a 

Collection from a student loan (conserve)

I have tried myself to get rid of them, to no avail  

---

[Anonymous]

Do you like them? I was thinking of using them.

[gdale6]

All a credit repair agency can do is send dispute letters over and over again no one need pay them for this service.

[sjt]

---

@gdale6 wrote:

All a credit repair agency can do is send dispute letters over and over again no one need pay them for this service.

---

+++++1

[CYBERSAM]

How long it took them to do a removal?

[TRC_WA]

---

@CYBERSAM wrote:

How long it took them to do a removal?

---

I'd wager as long as possible so they can continuing collecting their $99 a month to dispute things on your credit report...

... what you can do yourself for free.

[RobertEG]

They cannot continue to file renewed disputes that are substantially the same as a prior dispute.

Any such disputes can be dismissed as frivolous or irrelevant.

Renewed communications that are only GW request could continue, but would have no requirement for response.

Credit repair organizations are specifically exempt for filing any direct disputes on behalf of a consumer, or in assising the consumer is any such direct disputes.

Only the consumer can use the direct dispute process.  See 16 CFR 660.4(f).

They geerally send renewed GW requests.  They are informal requests that the consumer can file on his/her own.