cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Which would I be better off doing?

tag
Creditdreamer
Established Contributor

Which would I be better off doing?

Citi is my large collection at 7500 right now. I want to do PFD but haven't heard of any successes with Citi and dont particularly want to risk being sued. The CA is offering 2500 settlement. Would I be better off paying the settlement amount and then taking the extra 5k and putting it on a couple secured cards with high limits and just letting Citi (after being paid) age for a while? Or should I PIF and then GW them like crazy?
Starting: EQ 498 TU 501 EX 485 (9/23/11)
As of 5/12: EQ 552 TU 591 EX 572
Credit Repair Journey Bump in the Road
As of 10/15: EQ 511 TU 588 EX 601
Discover TU Fico- 12/31/18: 694; CK EQ- 1/16/19: 634
Goal: All 3 above 700

Message 1 of 4
3 REPLIES 3
rckstrscott
Valued Contributor

Re: Which would I be better off doing?


@Creditdreamer wrote:
Citi is my large collection at 7500 right now. I want to do PFD but haven't heard of any successes with Citi and dont particularly want to risk being sued. The CA is offering 2500 settlement. Would I be better off paying the settlement amount and then taking the extra 5k and putting it on a couple secured cards with high limits and just letting Citi (after being paid) age for a while? Or should I PIF and then GW them like crazy?


Wow.. that is rock and a hard place if I have ever seen it..

 

Ultimately, when you are talking money as large as this, I think priority should not be your credit report or score, but the debt itself and the chance you could get sued. If they sue you for $7500, it will be a lot more than $7500 when they start factoring in legal fees, interest, ect..

 

The credit score is just a number. It makes your life more challenging with a lower number, but no credit score wil put you in legal trouble.

 

Getting $5000 off your bill, to legally settle is, is not a bad deal. If I were you, I would seriously considering taking it and just let that account age for a while, then tackle goodwill. Just because you settled doesn't mean you cannot try. You might find a sympathetic ear after its been in the rearview a little while....

 

-Scott

Starting FICO Score: October 2010: TU 498 | EQ: 502
Current FICO Scores:: May 2022: TU: 784 | EQ: 770 | EX: 790
Message 2 of 4
rckstrscott
Valued Contributor

Re: Which would I be better off doing?

FYI, I have a 744 score right now with a paid 5k collection that is pushing 4 years since DOFD. So you can get moderately good scores even if they still report, given adequate aging.

 

-scott

 

edited for typos galore

Starting FICO Score: October 2010: TU 498 | EQ: 502
Current FICO Scores:: May 2022: TU: 784 | EQ: 770 | EX: 790
Message 3 of 4
Creditdreamer
Established Contributor

Re: Which would I be better off doing?

Thanks for the info. You make good points and have reaffirmed what I was thinking in the back of my mind. If I go ahead and accept the 2500 then that also takes away the waiting part of it, which is where I was worried the suing would come in. And especially because it's such a high amount I didn't want to risk it. Unfortunately 2000 of the 7500 is interest and fees but I still think that 2500 is a good settlement.
Starting: EQ 498 TU 501 EX 485 (9/23/11)
As of 5/12: EQ 552 TU 591 EX 572
Credit Repair Journey Bump in the Road
As of 10/15: EQ 511 TU 588 EX 601
Discover TU Fico- 12/31/18: 694; CK EQ- 1/16/19: 634
Goal: All 3 above 700

Message 4 of 4
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.