Reply
Established Contributor
Posts: 545
Registered: ‎02-10-2009
0

Who To Apply To About NY 5 Year Rule?

[ Edited ]

DH's credit is great across the board now - except for an old $35 paid collection that I could never GW off, showing on Experian only.

 

The opening date of this was 1/1/08 - and we live in NY, so I should be able to get it off at this point, right?

 

I know that Experian likes to ignore the 5 year rule in NY - so should I dispute it with them, or write to the CA citing the NY law and ask therm to remove it?

 

BTW, I don't have a DOFD showing - is the "date open" enough?  This is how it looks on the report:

 

Date Opened:
01/2008
Date of Status:
03/2009
Reported Since:
04/2008
Last Reported Date:
03/2009

Type:
Collection
Terms:
1 Months 
Monthly Payment:
$0
Responsibility:
Individual 

Credit Limit:
$28
High Balance:
N/A 
Recent Balance:
N/A
Recent Payment:
N/A

 

 

______________________________________________________
DH starting scores 02/10/09: EX - 543, EQ - 543, TU - 554
Current scores: EQ - 750, TU - 732
My starting scores 03/13/10: EX - 711 (LO pull), EQ - 692, TU 701
Current scores: EQ 736, TU - 732
Epic Contributor
Posts: 22,406
Registered: ‎01-17-2008
0

Re: Who To Apply To About NY 5 Year Rule?

[ Edited ]

Since the 5 years just happened, I'd give them till the end of the month and see if it is deleted.

 

If it's not, I'd send a copy of the NY FCRA with the part about the 5 year rule for paid collections and a letter asking for removal to the CRA.

 

EX doesn't use the DoFD, there should be a remark about when it will be removed.

Epic Contributor
Posts: 20,945
Registered: ‎03-19-2007
0

Re: Who To Apply To About NY 5 Year Rule?

[ Edited ]

+1

The issue of CR exclusion is solely the responsibility of the CRA.  It is thus not an issue of inaccuracy of reported information, and is not addressed by way of the FCRA dispute processes.

It is an issue of CRA compliance with the NYS statute.  Send a complaint based on that statute.

 

Since EX uses a different interpretation of the NYS statute, continuing to base the date upon the reporting of the collection rather than the DOFD, you may anticipate a battle.

If they take that position, I would send a formal complaint to the FTC, arguing that they should be using the DOFD, as is the standard under the federal FCRA, and should be consistently applied, as is done by the other two CRAs, in interpretation of the NYS statute.

Perhaps the FTC will weigh-in.

Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.
† Credit cards for FICO Score ranges: The score ranges are guidelines based on actual applicant approvals and having a FICO Score in a particular range does not guarantee you will be approved for credit cards recommended in that range.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.