Reply
Regular Contributor
Posts: 135
Registered: ‎08-28-2008

check this out

I have a collection account (bad check) listed under my revolving accounts.  It just updated today as being 120 lates for november and december of 2008.  We haven't even hit those months yet.
08/28/08 TU 568 EQ 512 Ex 545
10/06/08 TU 550 EQ 522 EX 545

Thanks to all board members for their insight and wisdom.
Regular Contributor
Posts: 135
Registered: ‎08-28-2008

Re: check this out

would an ITS be the right way to go or should I contact the FTC, BBB and AG on this???
08/28/08 TU 568 EQ 512 Ex 545
10/06/08 TU 550 EQ 522 EX 545

Thanks to all board members for their insight and wisdom.
Regular Contributor
Posts: 135
Registered: ‎08-28-2008

Re: check this out

bump
08/28/08 TU 568 EQ 512 Ex 545
10/06/08 TU 550 EQ 522 EX 545

Thanks to all board members for their insight and wisdom.
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 32,869
Registered: ‎08-04-2007
0

Re: check this out

Wow! They sure are forward thinking.

 

I personally wouldn't file complaints. Not now anyway. Filing complaints won't make them go away, usually. I personally would focus on removing the CA, rather than the lates. If I had to go after them because of the lates, then maybe I would scour the FCRA to see if I could catch them on a reporting gaff. If they remove the lates now, then there is nothing stopping them from adding lates next month and the month after. If they do go away, it'll likely end up with another CA.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 1,255
Registered: ‎05-12-2008

Re: check this out

llecs is right, and in general a bad check is not perceived very well, it has a long SOL and you don't want to stroke them the wrong way.

I would focus on PFD.

Feb 08 550s - Oct 08 700s
Thank you MyFico!
Mega Contributor
Posts: 19,558
Registered: ‎03-19-2007

Re: check this out

[ Edited ]

 

Clearly, holding you to delinquencies that have not yet legally occured is stupid, and must clearly be a computer snaffu, which is what they will tell you.

FTC complaints are the last resort under the FCRA.  You have to have your ducks in a row before you do this.  I would not take it to that level until I was sure there was a clear and documented FCRA abuse. 

The OC can continue to post later account delinquencies until such time as they close, CO, or CA the account.  So more info is needed on the precise account status.

YOu can get that info, before going FTC ballistic, by filing a dispute under section 611(a) of the FCRA with the CRA, and requrie them to investigate this for you.

 

I agree totally with the advice of llecs and demed.  Find out the CA role in all of this first.  Get the facts together.

 

Message Edited by RobertEG on 10-10-2008 01:24 AM
Message Edited by RobertEG on 10-10-2008 01:25 AM

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions based on Experian or Equifax data (additional FICO® Score versions based on TransUnion data are not currently available on myFICO.com). Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.