No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
@muumike wrote:
Had a account with tmobile(OC) that went to collection with Enhanced Recovery (CA listed on reports). Handled debt PIF through OC and CA recently updated to $0 balance.
Question: shouldn't they remove the tradeline if I handled it through the OC directly? To address this, should I send them a DV? From my understanding, this should be off my report since OC who was not reporting accepted my debt payment (after issuing me a bill prior to payment and payment confirmation/updating balance to $0 through paperwork directly given to me), and it seems on my report like Enhanced was the one that collected the payment.
I would love some help with this one guys.
Unfortunately, paying the OC doesn't change that fact that it went to collections, so the CA is still allowed to report However, I would try to get the OC to request the CA to remove their reporting ~ sometimes this is successful, but not always.
I thought that items in collections had to be paid through the CA, ... Is there any advantage / disadvantage to trying to deal with the OC vs the CA? I am getting ready to tackle about 10 CA line items this month and was going to work with them with PFD requests.
Should I GW the OC and/or CA instead of trying to DV the CA? Or do I just call the OC and see if they can request the tradeline be removed?
I figured since I handled it directly through the OC without ever communicating with the CA that they could be tagged for incorrectly reporting that the account was paid through them whereas the OC does not report as a tradeline as well.
@someone379 wrote:I thought that items in collections had to be paid through the CA, ... Is there any advantage / disadvantage to trying to deal with the OC vs the CA? I am getting ready to tackle about 10 CA line items this month and was going to work with them with PFD requests.
Paying either the CA or the OC depends on who is reporting, or also if you are trying to do a PFD, or who actually owns the debt. Sometimes companies will still accept payments even if they have a CA also working on their behalf to collect the debt. If an OC has sold the debt then you usually have to work through the CA to pay.
I would always rather work with the OC to settle a debt, but if the CA is reporting and the OC isn't then you should work with the CA and hopefully get a PFD.
When I contacted OC on a whim, they said I could deal directly with them instead. I decided to PIF to the OC even after receiving a dunning from the CA with a settlement amount for about 40% of total debt owed. Where I PIF'd I would think that makes me a little more viable to have them remove it, no?? Or did I basically just get suckered?
@muumike wrote:Should I GW the OC and/or CA instead of trying to DV the CA? Or do I just call the OC and see if they can request the tradeline be removed?
I figured since I handled it directly through the OC without ever communicating with the CA that they could be tagged for incorrectly reporting that the account was paid through them whereas the OC does not report as a tradeline as well.
I would start with the OC, and ask them to leverage the CA to remove the colletion. I believe that the CA is allowed to report the current balance of $0; even if the OC was paid is doesn't change the fact that it was sent to collections.
@muumike wrote:When I contacted OC on a whim, they said I could deal directly with them instead. I decided to PIF to the OC even after receiving a dunning from the CA with a settlement amount for about 40% of total debt owed. Where I PIF'd I would think that makes me a little more viable to have them remove it, no?? Or did I basically just get suckered?
Yes, I would leverage it, and would certainly let the OC know that you expect them to tell the CA to remove the collection since you paid in full.