Reply
Moderator
Posts: 27,206
Registered: ‎09-13-2012

Re: Sams v Costco


ExplicitElicit wrote:

09Lexie wrote:

I have both memberships. Each serves a purpose for me, so I'll keep them.  As far as shopping, Costco ALWAYS has long lines and at least the Sams Clubs I frequent have self checkouts. 

 

 


Lexie your Costco does not have self check out lines? I was under the impression they all did these days, at least mine does and a few others i've visited. 


Nope, not any I've been to in So CA

Valued Contributor
Posts: 2,362
Registered: ‎06-21-2014

Re: Sams v Costco

[ Edited ]

ExplicitElicit wrote:

09Lexie wrote:

I have both memberships. Each serves a purpose for me, so I'll keep them.  As far as shopping, Costco ALWAYS has long lines and at least the Sams Clubs I frequent have self checkouts. 

 

 


Lexie your Costco does not have self check out lines? I was under the impression they all did these days, at least mine does and a few others i've visited. 


The one In Brooklyn NY, and Deer Park in Long Island, NY both don't have self checkout lines. 

 

 

I love costco but I don't like they only accept Amex and forced me to app for Amex cards lol. 


My Cards: Amex BCE $3,000; Amex Everyday $12,000; Amazon Store Card $2,800; Amazon Visa $1,000; Chase Freedom $4,500; Chase Slate $5,000; Chase Sapphire Preferred $5,000; Chase Marriott: $5,000; Citi Thank you preferred $6,000; Citi Simplicity $4,000; Discover it $2,500, BestBuy Store card $2,000; Capital one QS $1,500; Bank Of america MLB rewards card $10,000; Capital one Playstation card $2,500; Barclay's NFL extra point card: $2,000
EX:717, TU:730, EQ: 704
Super Contributor
Posts: 8,841
Registered: ‎06-19-2013

Re: Sams v Costco


Closingracer99 wrote:

ExplicitElicit wrote:

09Lexie wrote:

I have both memberships. Each serves a purpose for me, so I'll keep them.  As far as shopping, Costco ALWAYS has long lines and at least the Sams Clubs I frequent have self checkouts. 

 

 


Lexie your Costco does not have self check out lines? I was under the impression they all did these days, at least mine does and a few others i've visited. 


The one In Brooklyn NY, and Deer Park in Long Island, NY both don't have self checkout lines. 

 

 

I love costco but I don't like they only accept Amex and forced me to app for Amex cards lol. 


One in port chester,NY and Norwalk,ct also don't have self checkout. For all that I spend on at Costco I may have to apply for fidelity amex lol 



EX Fico 774 3/3/15 Fako 808 CS/Credit.com 11/24/14
EQ SW bank enhanced 3/24/15 819 CK fako 807 2/7/15
TU Fico Barclay's 3/26/15 791 TU fico walmart 3/23/2015 788 Fako 808 Creditkarma 3/23/15
Established Contributor
Posts: 580
Registered: ‎04-02-2014

Re: Sams v Costco


Closingracer99 wrote:

ExplicitElicit wrote:

09Lexie wrote:

I have both memberships. Each serves a purpose for me, so I'll keep them.  As far as shopping, Costco ALWAYS has long lines and at least the Sams Clubs I frequent have self checkouts. 

 

 


Lexie your Costco does not have self check out lines? I was under the impression they all did these days, at least mine does and a few others i've visited. 


The one In Brooklyn NY, and Deer Park in Long Island, NY both don't have self checkout lines. 

 

 

I love costco but I don't like they only accept Amex and forced me to app for Amex cards lol. 


You will be thanking them for locking in your MSD down the road though! :smileytongue:






EX FICO (myFICO): 742 (7/1/14) | TU FICO (Discover): 735 (4/7/15) | EQ FICO (Citi): 723 (3/24/15)
Super Contributor
Posts: 6,219
Registered: ‎09-22-2012

Re: Sams v Costco


bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.

Established Contributor
Posts: 785
Registered: ‎04-24-2014

Re: Sams v Costco


B335is wrote:

bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.


Do you know this to be the case that Sam's Club generates less?  Both companies profit margin doesn't indicate this.  Do you have data or a link that supports this statement or is it a supposition?  There are other stores that generate far less profit that still pay their employees a living wage.  Data indicates that if Walmart and Sam's Club paid more, their profit would go up.  Because most of their employees shop there and would actually buy more items.  In addition, the $s that they spend else where also circulate and make it back to their store.  Greed is greed.  It's not based on need.  Sam's Club can get away with it so they do. 

 

You can't rationalize greed.  It's like the tricle down economics theory which has been proven to be false. Greed has people still saying that if you give the "job creators" more money they will create more jobs.  This would be fine if you gave money to the true "Job creators" consumers. Based on economics, consumers or average to low wage earners spend more money when they get more money.  Middle to high income earners, save more money when they get more money.  

 

Therefore, give more money to low wage earners, increases demand, thereby, increasing jobs. Hording does not increase demand, nor does it create jobs. Giving Walmart and Sam's Club employees a livable wage will create jobs and cost the average Walmart shopper less the 20cents more per shopping trip (if Walmart passes the total cost to the consumer). Again greed defies logic & It's the Economics major rearing up in me that makes me shake my head. On the other hand, it's also the economics major in me that decides that Sam's Club won't dip into my pocket twice: once at the register & second time through my taxes.



Current Score: EX 839 EQ 794:TU 792 on 7/4/14; EQ from myfFico on 6-26-14
Starting Score: EX 751 EQ 720 TU 737 on 4/9/14
Goal Score: 800+ on all three Bureaus
Garden since 11/26/14 -- In the garden until 6/2016

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 496
Registered: ‎10-08-2011

Re: Sams v Costco


bdhu2001 wrote:

B335is wrote:

bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.


Do you know this to be the case that Sam's Club generates less?  Both companies profit margin doesn't indicate this.  Do you have data or a link that supports this statement or is it a supposition?  There are other stores that generate far less profit that still pay their employees a living wage.  Data indicates that if Walmart and Sam's Club paid more, their profit would go up.  Because most of their employees shop there and would actually buy more items.  In addition, the $s that they spend else where also circulate and make it back to their store.  Greed is greed.  It's not based on need.  Sam's Club can get away with it so they do. 

 

You can't rationalize greed.  It's like the tricle down economics theory which has been proven to be false. Greed has people still saying that if you give the "job creators" more money they will create more jobs.  This would be fine if you gave money to the true "Job creators" consumers. Based on economics, consumers or average to low wage earners spend more money when they get more money.  Middle to high income earners, save more money when they get more money.  

 

Therefore, give more money to low wage earners, increases demand, thereby, increasing jobs. Hording does not increase demand, nor does it create jobs. Giving Walmart and Sam's Club employees a livable wage will create jobs and cost the average Walmart shopper less the 20cents more per shopping trip (if Walmart passes the total cost to the consumer). Again greed defies logic & It's the Economics major rearing up in me that makes me shake my head. On the other hand, it's also the economics major in me that decides that Sam's Club won't dip into my pocket twice: once at the register & second time through my taxes.


Just about sums up the number one reason I avoid shopping at Wal-Mart or Sam's Club if I can help it.

 

It's a sleazy company all around.

      
Super Contributor
Posts: 6,219
Registered: ‎09-22-2012

Re: Sams v Costco

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-08-27/why-walmart-will-never-pay-like-costco
bdhu2001 wrote:

B335is wrote:

bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.


Do you know this to be the case that Sam's Club generates less?  Both companies profit margin doesn't indicate this.  Do you have data or a link that supports this statement or is it a supposition?  There are other stores that generate far less profit that still pay their employees a living wage.  Data indicates that if Walmart and Sam's Club paid more, their profit would go up.  Because most of their employees shop there and would actually buy more items.  In addition, the $s that they spend else where also circulate and make it back to their store.  Greed is greed.  It's not based on need.  Sam's Club can get away with it so they do. 

 

You can't rationalize greed.  It's like the tricle down economics theory which has been proven to be false. Greed has people still saying that if you give the "job creators" more money they will create more jobs.  This would be fine if you gave money to the true "Job creators" consumers. Based on economics, consumers or average to low wage earners spend more money when they get more money.  Middle to high income earners, save more money when they get more money.  

 

Therefore, give more money to low wage earners, increases demand, thereby, increasing jobs. Hording does not increase demand, nor does it create jobs. Giving Walmart and Sam's Club employees a livable wage will create jobs and cost the average Walmart shopper less the 20cents more per shopping trip (if Walmart passes the total cost to the consumer). Again greed defies logic & It's the Economics major rearing up in me that makes me shake my head. On the other hand, it's also the economics major in me that decides that Sam's Club won't dip into my pocket twice: once at the register & second time through my taxes.

bloombergview

So what defines greed?  $1 profit or $10 billion profit?  Nobody is forcing anyone to work at Walmart or Sam's. Why is it our duty to decide what constitutes a living wage to folks who are free to pursue other career options.  

 

 

Established Contributor
Posts: 785
Registered: ‎04-24-2014

Re: Sams v Costco


B335is wrote:
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-08-27/why-walmart-will-never-pay-like-costco
bdhu2001 wrote:

B335is wrote:

bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.


Do you know this to be the case that Sam's Club generates less?  Both companies profit margin doesn't indicate this.  Do you have data or a link that supports this statement or is it a supposition?  There are other stores that generate far less profit that still pay their employees a living wage.  Data indicates that if Walmart and Sam's Club paid more, their profit would go up.  Because most of their employees shop there and would actually buy more items.  In addition, the $s that they spend else where also circulate and make it back to their store.  Greed is greed.  It's not based on need.  Sam's Club can get away with it so they do. 

 

You can't rationalize greed.  It's like the tricle down economics theory which has been proven to be false. Greed has people still saying that if you give the "job creators" more money they will create more jobs.  This would be fine if you gave money to the true "Job creators" consumers. Based on economics, consumers or average to low wage earners spend more money when they get more money.  Middle to high income earners, save more money when they get more money.  

 

Therefore, give more money to low wage earners, increases demand, thereby, increasing jobs. Hording does not increase demand, nor does it create jobs. Giving Walmart and Sam's Club employees a livable wage will create jobs and cost the average Walmart shopper less the 20cents more per shopping trip (if Walmart passes the total cost to the consumer). Again greed defies logic & It's the Economics major rearing up in me that makes me shake my head. On the other hand, it's also the economics major in me that decides that Sam's Club won't dip into my pocket twice: once at the register & second time through my taxes.

bloombergview

So what defines greed?  $1 profit or $10 billion profit?  Nobody is forcing anyone to work at Walmart or Sam's. Why is it our duty to decide what constitutes a living wage to folks who are free to pursue other career options.  

 

 


It's not your duty. No one says it's your duty.  I simply state why I won't shop there or give Walmart & Sam's the opportunity to double dip in my pocket.  Right now corporations are doing everything possible to change this into a feudal society where everyone works for the lowest wages possible. In this way, there's no competition for people to work for someone else, because everyone pays the same.  Saying no one forces people to work at Walmart is the same as saying no one forces people to breath air.  

 

People need jobs and funds to survive. When kids and other people's fingers were being cut off due to poor safety practices in factories, no one forced them to work in the factories either.  As an economist, I keep watching this country and remember the adage "And then they came for me, but no one was left and no one was left to speak for me."  They started by dividing us into being upset with welfare recipents.  Next they outsourced jobs 100,000s, but we were getting cheaper products. Those jobs added up so our economy began to falter, because the people laid off could no longer afford items. Then it was government workers fault, then teachers faults, then the Union's fault, now it's low income workers and the unemployed people's fault.

 

It's the chip, chip, chip away system. Next it'll be that the aged are living too long and creating a burden, then kids are not productive and are a drain (they need to work in tabaco farms).  Okay, these aren't next, it's already happening.  My point is you decide when it's your time to speak up and stand.  Hopefully, before they come for you & yours.



Current Score: EX 839 EQ 794:TU 792 on 7/4/14; EQ from myfFico on 6-26-14
Starting Score: EX 751 EQ 720 TU 737 on 4/9/14
Goal Score: 800+ on all three Bureaus
Garden since 11/26/14 -- In the garden until 6/2016

Mega Contributor
Posts: 16,663
Registered: ‎08-08-2011

Re: Sams v Costco


bdhu2001 wrote:

B335is wrote:
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2013-08-27/why-walmart-will-never-pay-like-costco
bdhu2001 wrote:

B335is wrote:

bdhu2001 wrote:

I choose Costco:

  1. Value: when I buy stuff at Costco I find good quality products.  Doesn't fall apart, taste bad, rot quickly.
  2. Exchange policy.  I love not having to worry, even if it's rarely used (2 returns in 11 years).
  3. Quicker lines, including self check out.  When I went to Sam's club they seemed to try to keep as few lines as possible & had the Walmart feel of cheap not inexpensive good value for money.  For instance I bought a workout outfit & the bottom of the top ended up being unfinished. 
  4. Knowlege of the way Sam's club treats their employees and the fact that I'm subsidig their profit with my tax $s, because they don't pay living wages was the last straw.  a) I don't find good value. b) they're greedy & don't provide good service (i.e most lines closed) c)Double dipping: using Food Banks and my tax $ to supplement employee's wages when they make billions per year.

Well in all fairness to point #4, the average Sam's Club employee generates far less revenue than one of Costco's employees so it isn't exactly an apples to apples comparison.  I've also never waited in line for more than 5 minutes at Sam's Club.

 

I guess it's all personal preference and experience.  Sam's is 10 minutes from my house, Costco is 25 minutes.  Costco always has traffic backed out into the street, Sam's doesn't.


Do you know this to be the case that Sam's Club generates less?  Both companies profit margin doesn't indicate this.  Do you have data or a link that supports this statement or is it a supposition?  There are other stores that generate far less profit that still pay their employees a living wage.  Data indicates that if Walmart and Sam's Club paid more, their profit would go up.  Because most of their employees shop there and would actually buy more items.  In addition, the $s that they spend else where also circulate and make it back to their store.  Greed is greed.  It's not based on need.  Sam's Club can get away with it so they do. 

 

You can't rationalize greed.  It's like the tricle down economics theory which has been proven to be false. Greed has people still saying that if you give the "job creators" more money they will create more jobs.  This would be fine if you gave money to the true "Job creators" consumers. Based on economics, consumers or average to low wage earners spend more money when they get more money.  Middle to high income earners, save more money when they get more money.  

 

Therefore, give more money to low wage earners, increases demand, thereby, increasing jobs. Hording does not increase demand, nor does it create jobs. Giving Walmart and Sam's Club employees a livable wage will create jobs and cost the average Walmart shopper less the 20cents more per shopping trip (if Walmart passes the total cost to the consumer). Again greed defies logic & It's the Economics major rearing up in me that makes me shake my head. On the other hand, it's also the economics major in me that decides that Sam's Club won't dip into my pocket twice: once at the register & second time through my taxes.

bloombergview

So what defines greed?  $1 profit or $10 billion profit?  Nobody is forcing anyone to work at Walmart or Sam's. Why is it our duty to decide what constitutes a living wage to folks who are free to pursue other career options.  

 

 


It's not your duty. No one says it's your duty.  I simply state why I won't shop there or give Walmart & Sam's the opportunity to double dip in my pocket.  Right now corporations are doing everything possible to change this into a feudal society where everyone works for the lowest wages possible. In this way, there's no competition for people to work for someone else, because everyone pays the same.  Saying no one forces people to work at Walmart is the same as saying no one forces people to breath air.  

 

People need jobs and funds to survive. When kids and other people's fingers were being cut off due to poor safety practices in factories, no one forced them to work in the factories either.  As an economist, I keep watching this country and remember the adage "And then they came for me, but no one was left and no one was left to speak for me."  They started by dividing us into being upset with welfare recipents.  Next they outsourced jobs 100,000s, but we were getting cheaper products. Those jobs added up so our economy began to falter, because the people laid off could no longer afford items. Then it was government workers fault, then teachers faults, then the Union's fault, now it's low income workers and the unemployed people's fault.

 

It's the chip, chip, chip away system. Next it'll be that the aged are living too long and creating a burden, then kids are not productive and are a drain (they need to work in tabaco farms).  Okay, these aren't next, it's already happening.  My point is you decide when it's your time to speak up and stand.  Hopefully, before they come for you & yours.


That's why they created unions but with corporation lobbyist's and a corrupt govt we see where peoples rights went with union breaking and lax import taxes. But who do we want to punish by working from the bottom up. The ones who least can afford It.

Advertiser Disclosure: The listings that appear on myFICO are from companies from which myFICO receives compensation, which may impact how and where products appear on myFICO (including, for example, the order in which they appear). myFICO does not review or include all companies or all available products.

Copyright ©2001-2015 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved.   | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: All FICO® Score products made available on myFICO.com include a FICO® Score 8, along with additional FICO® Score versions. Your lender or insurer may use a different FICO® Score than the versions you receive from myFICO, or another type of credit score altogether. Learn more

FICO, myFICO, Score Watch, The score lenders use, and The Score That Matters are trademarks or registered trademarks of Fair Isaac Corporation. Equifax Credit Report is a trademark of Equifax, Inc. and its affiliated companies. Many factors affect your FICO Score and the interest rates you may receive. Fair Isaac is not a credit repair organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. Fair Isaac does not provide "credit repair" services or advice or assistance regarding "rebuilding" or "improving" your credit record, credit history or credit rating. FTC's website on credit.