No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
So credit karma just went to a new model "Vantagescore 3.0" and my scores went from upper 700s to lower 700s based on Experian and TU. I didn't like this so I paid for some scores through myfico. They are all upper 700s to lower 800s. Why the discrepancy? Its so frustrating seeing such a huge difference. Anyone have any thoughts?
Two different scoring models. You can safely ignore the Vantage scores provided by CK; only a tiny minority of issuers ever use those scores. Use CK just for the free access to the information in your reports.
There are a few things in play. First, the old credit karma score had a top scale of 950, so scores could look better just based on that. 2nd vantage scores consider a different mix of credit than fico does. Most of us here simply use CK as a tool to monitor what is going on with our reports. It is an excellent tool for that, instant alerts for new accounts, inquiries, or something negative popping up. There are a few reports of CCCs using vantage scores, but most lenders use fico in some flavor. Your scores are excellent as is, I would pay less attention to the scores on CK and just use it as a way to monitor what is going on.