cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score

tag
trusty
Frequent Contributor

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@Anonymous wrote:


Except "your" FICO score isn't yours, it's FICO's.  The lenders care because FICO isn't just a risk metric, it's a profit metric.  Debt isn't financed by lenders as much as investors, and lender-servicers use FICO scoring to sell investment-grade credit tranches to investors.

 

So in the end, your FICO score is closer to your "how profitable is this person" score to investors.

 

Also remember, and I say this as someone who has invested in ABS packages in the past, that a person with an 850 FICO score is probably less profitable than someone with a 600 score.  I've had my eye out on subprime credit investments because I'm willing to stake a big risk to get a sweet piece of that 29% interest rate on store cards.  Someone with an 850 score doesn't appeal to my risk-reward strategy, but neither does someone with a 490 score.  That 600-679 range looks perfect, especially with the new FICO deep history products that let you analyze an individual creditor over time to see if they're likely to carry a balance.


 

This is spot on. But, it's also a cautionary tale of capitalism run amok. We shouldn't be finding ways to loan shark society. It may be great for taking advantage of the misery of others; but, long term, it's not at all healthy for society as a whole.

Message 11 of 46
arkane
Established Contributor

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@Anonymous wrote:

@arkane wrote:


I'd argue I could just as easily game the system by opening an SSL/Self Lender/some other secured loan with paltry interest just prior to paying off a loan so I always have at least one installment account open. I understand FICO's algorithm is based on big data, but I just think it ridiculous that the more financially responsible you are, the more you have to game the system just to maximize your score. Then again there's probably an argument to be made about not conforming to the norm or being the 0.01%. 


Except "your" FICO score isn't yours, it's FICO's.  The lenders care because FICO isn't just a risk metric, it's a profit metric.  Debt isn't financed by lenders as much as investors, and lender-servicers use FICO scoring to sell investment-grade credit tranches to investors.

 

So in the end, your FICO score is closer to your "how profitable is this person" score to investors.

 

Also remember, and I say this as someone who has invested in ABS packages in the past, that a person with an 850 FICO score is probably less profitable than someone with a 600 score.  I've had my eye out on subprime credit investments because I'm willing to stake a big risk to get a sweet piece of that 29% interest rate on store cards.  Someone with an 850 score doesn't appeal to my risk-reward strategy, but neither does someone with a 490 score.  That 600-679 range looks perfect, especially with the new FICO deep history products that let you analyze an individual creditor over time to see if they're likely to carry a balance.


Great point, probably best to think of FICO in terms of a "profitability score" and everything will make much more sense. 

 

And by that metric, I'm probably sub, sub, subprime. 

Active:

Closed:


6/8/20:

Message 12 of 46
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@trusty wrote:

This is spot on. But, it's also a cautionary tale of capitalism run amok. We shouldn't be finding ways to loan shark society. It may be great for taking advantage of the misery of others; but, long term, it's not at all healthy for society as a whole.


Not to get too political, but I am thankful that my mentor when I was 16 guided me to reading Pareto's works when I was young (namely The Mind and Society and Manual of Political Economy, then later in life I read The Rise and Fall of Elites when the American translation was completed).  Pareto is the "inventor" of the 80/20 rule or the Pareto Principle which is based on his analyses of many different political structures and how no matter what a population supports (communism, socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, etc), the 20% rule and the 80% are ruled and distracted by consumer goods (bread and circuses was first mentioned in 100 AD!).

 

My investments are never guided by MY moral or ethical foundation, but on society's.  If society wants to blow people up, I invest in bombs.  If society wants to build schools and hospitals, I invest in construction.  If society wants to find Pokemon at the bus stop, I invest in video games.  I take absolutely NO view of what society wants to do, I just want to be invested in it before CNN and Fox News call it a bubble.

 

I sold my real estate properties in 2007 thanks to CNN and Fox News telling everyone to buy.  I bought Bitcoin in 2012.  I invested in war stocks when Bush II got elected.  Society makes the decision on what they want to blow incomes on, and I try to position myself ahead of the rest.

 

 

Message 13 of 46
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score

Here's a thought I'd like to throw out there.  Inside the OP's first post, and inside Trusty's first response, are two different conversational topics:

 

(1) DESCRIPTIVE.  How does FICO 8 in fact work, with respect to installment debt?  This question helps the person predict the effect of decisions he makes on his score, and may also suggest work arounds.  A related question is, once you know how FICO 8 works, do the other models work differently?  (E.g. the old mortgage models, FICO 9, the various Auto and Bankcard flavors, etc.)

 

(2)  PRESCRIPTIVE.  Is the reality described in #1 (the way the model does in fact work) something that is wrong, or broken, or defective, or otherwise in need of improvement?  (And here we want clarification on improved for who?  To make the customers happy?  To give the lenders better gauge of risk?)  Related here are the Illuminati style speculations about whether FICO is in bed with all the big banks to force consumers to stay in debt.

 

I'd suggest that the two things are very different, and they can be easily conflated, sometimes even within the same paragraph.  Trusty began by asking if we had data to show that ABCD's description (#1) was right, and then began to argue against it in a prescriptive sense (#2).

 

The description as given by ABCD is right.  FICO 8 likes it when you have open debt that is mostly paid off.  It likes it much less when you have no open debt or when you do but owe most of the original amount.

 

Prescriptively, I think it is likely (just my opinion) that future models will consider closed installment loans with a long payment history (e.g. 36+ months) where the person made a payment every month.  That's easier to do when a model has "trended data" -- and these data only became available pretty recently, in the larger history of credit reporting.  TD did not exist at all back when FICO 8 was released.

 

To circle back to the OP's original question, it's hard to know what will happen (descriptively) because we don't know from his initial post what open installment loans he still has.  Here is what we'd need to know:

 

Just before the mortgage payoff, list your open installments loans:

* Mortgage.  Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

* Loan.      Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

* Loan.      Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

 etc.

 

When the new mortgage appears, what will it look like?

* Mortgage.  Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

 

PS.  Atravuzdar is basically saying this too -- we need to know more about his loans.

Message 14 of 46
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score

I agree -- I do think future FICO flavors will probably give some power to installment loan payment history, even if closed.

 

FICO actually provides products already that track a person's activity over time -- but FICO Score doesn't.  Lenders can pay extra for these additional products to use internally, and I'm sure some do pay for it but don't use it specifically for approvals or denials per se.

Message 15 of 46
trusty
Frequent Contributor

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@Anonymous wrote:

@trusty wrote:

This is spot on. But, it's also a cautionary tale of capitalism run amok. We shouldn't be finding ways to loan shark society. It may be great for taking advantage of the misery of others; but, long term, it's not at all healthy for society as a whole.


Not to get too political, but I am thankful that my mentor when I was 16 guided me to reading Pareto's works when I was young (namely The Mind and Society and Manual of Political Economy, then later in life I read The Rise and Fall of Elites when the American translation was completed).  Pareto is the "inventor" of the 80/20 rule or the Pareto Principle which is based on his analyses of many different political structures and how no matter what a population supports (communism, socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, etc), the 20% rule and the 80% are ruled and distracted by consumer goods (bread and circuses was first mentioned in 100 AD!).

 

My investments are never guided by MY moral or ethical foundation, but on society's.  If society wants to blow people up, I invest in bombs.  If society wants to build schools and hospitals, I invest in construction.  If society wants to find Pokemon at the bus stop, I invest in video games.  I take absolutely NO view of what society wants to do, I just want to be invested in it before CNN and Fox News call it a bubble.

 

I sold my real estate properties in 2007 thanks to CNN and Fox News telling everyone to buy.  I bought Bitcoin in 2012.  I invested in war stocks when Bush II got elected.  Society makes the decision on what they want to blow incomes on, and I try to position myself ahead of the rest.

 

 


I'm not judging. I think it's smart. But, if enough money is invested on taking advantage of the woes of others... does that not itself engender more woes?

 

We can take ourselves apart from anything. But, collectively, our system only works for those that take advantage of others. Heck, I take advantage too. I'm just saying that it's not good civics, to allow society to allow a slick minority to loan shark the less fortunate. Why they are less fortunate is irrelevant, as taking advantage is just not the solution, long term.

 

So, I'm just playing the devil's advocate. I know that you or I are not the impetus for the fall of the Roman Empire... I'm just saying, there's a reason that rules need to be in place; because otherwise, if you take enough of other people's money, for long enough... there will be no more money for anyone to do anything with, and economics then dissolve.

Message 16 of 46
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@trusty wrote:


I'm not judging. I think it's smart. But, if enough money is invested on taking advantage of the woes of others... does that not itself engender more woes?

 

We can take ourselves apart from anything. But, collectively, our system only works for those that take advantage of others. Heck, I take advantage too. I'm just saying that it's not good civics, to allow society to allow a slick minority to loan shark the less fortunate. Why they are less fortunate is irrelevant, as taking advantage is just not the solution, long term.

 

So, I'm just playing the devil's advocate. I know that you or I are not the impetus for the fall of the Roman Empire... I'm just saying, there's a reason that rules need to be in place; because otherwise, if you take enough of other people's money, for long enough... there will be no more money for anyone to do anything with, and economics then dissolve.


I actually welcome people judging me because it gives me unique (and free) perspectives which help me make future considerations!  I prefer to be objectified as it's free insight.

 

That being said, read Pareto.  Since Pareto basically prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ALL societies in all of history have the 20% lords and  80% feudal servants ratio, nothing I do will change it.  I could invest only in charities and that percentage won't change.  Nothing I do changes society's momentum.

 

The more money I "take" from borrowers, the more money I have to spend myself.  I don't believe in trickle-down or trickle-up but I do believe in praxeology (as mentioned) and the offshoot called "catallactics" both which are determined either by individual action or individual action in aggregate.  Even if 100% of investors in debt pulled their money out, debt would continue to be created and furnished by others methods (as I found when I interviewed black market lenders in a communist country in the 90s where loans were illegal but almost everyone had a black market loan or 5).

 

The flip side to excess consumer spending is that I also know my investments help folks who know how to game the system.  Without these investments, rewards cards wouldn't exist, period.  So anyone with a cashback or travel card is just as culpable in the grand scheme of things (for creating demand) as the folks who invest in those packages (for creating the supply).

 

You can't stifle consumer demand, and as long as it exists, suppliers will fill in the supply.  This is one reason I don't consider myself a consumer, I prefer to be a supplier/producer.

Message 17 of 46
trusty
Frequent Contributor

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@Anonymous wrote:


That being said, read Pareto.  Since Pareto basically prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ALL societies in all of history have the 20% lords and  80% feudal servants ratio, nothing I do will change it.  I could invest only in charities and that percentage won't change.  Nothing I do changes society's momentum.

 


 

The problem is that we're well beyond 80/20. Basically, a few hundred people control almost all of the worlds resources, while paying very little taxes. The upper middle class figures out how to dodge a good portion of their taxes, whilst perpetually investing in the financial woes of the working class. It's a recipe for disaster.

 

Further, to say that individual behaviors don't matter, and policies don't matter... is a wholly defeatist philosophy. Everything matters. I agree that some things, and some have more influence than others, right or wrong.

 

But, if enough people just give up and give in to participating in statistically unsound societal behaviors, the results can therefore be extrapolated heretofore, as such.

Message 18 of 46
hajew86
New Contributor

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@Anonymous wrote:

Here's a thought I'd like to throw out there.  Inside the OP's first post, and inside Trusty's first response, are two different conversational topics:

 

(1) DESCRIPTIVE.  How does FICO 8 in fact work, with respect to installment debt?  This question helps the person predict the effect of decisions he makes on his score, and may also suggest work arounds.  A related question is, once you know how FICO 8 works, do the other models work differently?  (E.g. the old mortgage models, FICO 9, the various Auto and Bankcard flavors, etc.)

 

(2)  PRESCRIPTIVE.  Is the reality described in #1 (the way the model does in fact work) something that is wrong, or broken, or defective, or otherwise in need of improvement?  (And here we want clarification on improved for who?  To make the customers happy?  To give the lenders better gauge of risk?)  Related here are the Illuminati style speculations about whether FICO is in bed with all the big banks to force consumers to stay in debt.

 

I'd suggest that the two things are very different, and they can be easily conflated, sometimes even within the same paragraph.  Trusty began by asking if we had data to show that ABCD's description (#1) was right, and then began to argue against it in a prescriptive sense (#2).

 

The description as given by ABCD is right.  FICO 8 likes it when you have open debt that is mostly paid off.  It likes it much less when you have no open debt or when you do but owe most of the original amount.

 

Prescriptively, I think it is likely (just my opinion) that future models will consider closed installment loans with a long payment history (e.g. 36+ months) where the person made a payment every month.  That's easier to do when a model has "trended data" -- and these data only became available pretty recently, in the larger history of credit reporting.  TD did not exist at all back when FICO 8 was released.

 

To circle back to the OP's original question, it's hard to know what will happen (descriptively) because we don't know from his initial post what open installment loans he still has.  Here is what we'd need to know:

 

Just before the mortgage payoff, list your open installments loans:

* Mortgage.  Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

* Loan.      Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

* Loan.      Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

 etc.

 

When the new mortgage appears, what will it look like?

* Mortgage.  Balance =  _____    Original loan amount = _____

 

PS.  Atravuzdar is basically saying this too -- we need to know more about his loans.


To answer this question here is my specific profile:

 

Mortgage.  Balance = $138,000    Original loan amount = $155,000; FHA paid on for 4 years w/ no lates

No current open Installment loans/auto's

 

However for what it's worth:

2 closed auto loans PIF since 2009

1 closed PIF personal loan in 2016

 

New mortgage when it pops up: (my best guesstimate)

Mortgage.  Balance =  $265,100    Original loan amount =265,500

 

 

 

Message 19 of 46
Anonymous
Not applicable

Re: Paid Off Mortgage = Lowered FICO score


@trusty wrote:


 

The problem is that we're well beyond 80/20. Basically, a few hundred people control almost all of the worlds resources, while paying very little taxes. The upper middle class figures out how to dodge a good portion of their taxes, whilst perpetually investing in the financial woes of the working class. It's a recipe for disaster.

 

Further, to say that individual behaviors don't matter, and policies don't matter... is a wholly defeatist philosophy. Everything matters. I agree that some things, and some have more influence than others, right or wrong.

 

But, if enough people just give up and give in to participating in statistically unsound societal behaviors, the results can therefore be extrapolated heretofore, as such.


You'd think that was the case based on the yellow journalists in the main stream media and popular blogosphere, but their opinions are proven wrong and have been proven wrong for 60 years.  This is one reason I never read news that is free -- all my news I pay a pretty penny for.  I trust lobbying group newsletters way more than any free news headline, lol.

 

The top 20% of US households bring in over $92,000 per year.  The top quintile of net worth in the US is $640,000 or so.  Between both groups, the top 20% of Americans own 83% of wealth -- very very very close to Pareto's 80/20 rule.  

 

I've done recursive analyses of over 3000 "poor" Americans.  In close to 80% of those data runs, they were poor by choice not by luck.  I should mention that I've lived in poor to dirt-poor areas my entire adult life (even though never being poor myself) and I can vet my analyses based on direct witnessing of the desire for consumers to stay consumers and the rare 1-in-5 producers in even poor areas who increase net worth and move out when they can.

 

I don't believe financial news if it's free, because it is easily proven wrong in aggregate and easily proven wrong based on any one individual.

 

Introduce me to 10 different "poor" people at random and I will prove to you with just 2 hours of analyzing 5 years of consumer spending that 8 out of the 10 are poor by choice.  Period.

 

I was raised poor by very poor immigrant parents -- my dad made the decision to not be a consumer and today he's middle class, owns a small condo free and clear.  My mother never gave up her consumer craze and she's still dirt poor.  Both have heavy accents and no education/college.  Both are equally skilled.  Mom still cries about how the "system" is against her.  She has $0 in assets she bought from the 3 times she cash-out refinanced her 800 square foot home over 15 years, and today has less than 3% equity in it after 20 years of paying her mortgage.  If it wasn't my own mom I would probably lol at the story, but I've experienced it for myself hundreds of times every year when folks come to me for wealth-building mentorship and I give them the thumbs down when they can't avoid useless shopping for even the first 60 days.

 

I don't trust poverty in America.  The political players (count me in this group!) market poverty because it helps make us richer and more powerful when people believe the headlines.

Message 20 of 46
Advertiser Disclosure: The offers that appear on this site are from third party advertisers from whom FICO receives compensation.