No credit card required
Browse credit cards from a variety of issuers to see if there's a better card for you.
Does reducing utli make *that* much of a difference?
Current balances: Only the BBRZMC has reported its balance for the month. The two zero balances won't post until around the 22nd. Merrick is new, so I have no idea when it'll show up. Capital 1 cut their statement today, so no idea when it'll post.
HSBC #1- 0/300
Credit One - 0/350
Crapital 1 - 284/500
BBRZMC - 165/500
Merrick Bank - 170/500
Last month they reported 175/300, 211/350, 488/500, BBRZMC was 291/300 (for May), and Merrick wasn't there.
So last month our util was pretty high - about 81%. This month it's down to 28% (per my computer's calculator ) I saw an 8pt increase on credit karma from 583 to 591 after BBRZMC reported its 165 balance. I know it's FAKO and means diddly squat, but our May 12 FICOs were 565/556 per our lender. So we should see a jump, I'm hoping..with dropping our util down by about 60 percent.
Just looking for reassurance All of the extra money that doesn't go into savings is being put towards credit cards. I have an itch to go shopping for vacation, but it's hard!
Next to payment history, util is next important factor in your creddit score. It effects your DTI and AA as well. It also doesn't require time or GW to fix.
I saw huge score leaps when I got my utilization down from 65% to 5%, so I can attest that yes, it makes a huge difference. Getting the number of accounts reporting a balance down makes a big difference as well. I noticed Equifax seemed to really like that combination!
And if you can, spread the balance across multiple cards.
@BoysMumx2 wrote:Getting the number of accounts reporting a balance down makes a big difference as well.
@Tuscani wrote:And if you can, spread the balance across multiple cards.
These two things seem to be at odds with each other and can't both be right. Or might it be either depending on the bucket you are in?
Yes your on the right track it does make a huge diffrence, so keep up othe good work and if I were you in about 6-12 months I would go ahead and try to do a CLI on a couple of your lower CL cards so that your utilization in the future has some wiggle room.
Good Luck!
@compassion101 wrote:
@BoysMumx2 wrote:Getting the number of accounts reporting a balance down makes a big difference as well.
@Tuscani wrote:And if you can, spread the balance across multiple cards.
These two things seem to be at odds with each other and can't both be right. Or might it be either depending on the bucket you are in?
I believe that showing fewer balances on fewer cards is beneficial. My score sometimes drops when I accidentally let even a tiny balance show on an additional card. I believe in keeping the number of reported balances down.
The util of credit category is more comprehensive than just overall % util of revolving, and has many factors that can be managed today, rather than six months or a year from now.
Revolving util has at least three components. Overall % util, sum of individ revolv % utils, and % with balance.
Of those three, the ones that are most "controllable" on a monthly basis are individ utils and % with balance, which can be altered by shifting deck chairs without necessarily even reducing overall % util. Higher utils have proportionally more negative impact, and thus on a monthly basis, hitting the highest util card can help more than paying down, say, a 20% util card. And % with balance can be improved by putting $$ into getting another card down to $0.
Keeping utils low can also have less obvious benefits, such as avoiding potential credit limit decreases, or on the flip side, showing history that might foster the grant of higher CLs.
Lots of stuff to tweak. At a combined overall effect of 30%, score improvements can be more substantial than the fixation on lesser items, such as pursuing deletion of inquiries, which are short-lived, of relatively low impact, and almost impossible to get deleted.
Of course, the obvious rub in the ointment..... attacking utils requires $$$ !