Re: To Pay or Not to Pay, that is the Question..
01-22-2013 12:35 PM
Ok, so I imagine this question has been asked over a 1,000 times but I keep reading something different. Can someone please explain to me the difference of paying a cc completely to 0 or leaving 9% utilization on it? I have never let the balance go to 0 in fear of not having reoccurring account (OK) on my credit. Do I pay them completely off or leave them with a really low balance? Thanks in advance!
That depends what you want to do! If you have multiple cards, many people like to pay off the accounts to 0 while leaving one account with a 1-9% utilization amount over their total credit lines, in order to really maximize their scores.
If you're not planning on apping for anything anytime soon, this really isn't necessary. Feel free to have a small balances on whatever you want!
This is slightly incorrect. The general rule of thumb for optimal scoring is to have only one card report a balance with that balance being 9% or less of that card's individual credit limit. This makes sense if you think about it. If you have $50K in total available credit, 9% would be $4500. You don't want to let a $4500 balance report on a card with a $5K CL.
That's true, but usually that's a common sense thing. FICO scoring wise, as long the one account isn't maxed out, they're not gonna notice.But, then again, that doesn't mean though your creditor won't notice either!
But say for example I used my Shell card for utilization and the rest at zero to calculate 1% utility. When utilization is calcuated for a FICO purpose, it's over your total open revolving accounts. If i did 1% on my Shell, that's $8. Then, over my total accounts: $8/$29400 = 2.72108843537415e-4 = .027%!!!
Now, not sure how the FICO scoring model will weigh that. Will they round it to 0%? 1%? Would I be losing points this way now?
So take caution to the wind when playing around with utility!
FICOS: EX 762 EQ 717 TU 767 VantageScore 3.0: EX 746 EQ 758 TU 752