Ok great. Looks like Sallie Mae is reporting negative remarks still. Here is a copy/paste of my transunion:
| Aes/Suntrust Bank | XXXXXXXXXXXXX0002 | 9/2005 | $36,845 | Paid or paying as agreed | No | Details |
 Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXXXX0012 | 9/2005 | $0 | Paid or paying as agreed |  | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX102F | 12/1997 | $0 | Unrated | | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX106F | 10/1999 | $0 | Unrated | | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX105F | 8/1998 | $0 | Unrated | | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX104F | 3/1998 | $0 | Unrated | | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX103F | 3/1998 | $0 | Unrated | | Details |
| Sallie Mae | XXXXXXXXX107F | 8/2000 | $0 | Unrated |
TLs 107F, 104F, 105F are acutally private loans that have since been settled in full and I am in the process of getting them removed (per my agreement with SM). 102F, 103F, and 106F are federal and were actually consolidated into 0012, so I believe that should be counting duplicate TLs, as those 3 accounts have been 1 since 2005. The AES loan is the rehabbed loan, in good standing, back dated to 2005
