<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Trade line issue help needed in Bankruptcy</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2049113#M11964</link>
    <description>Equifax was pretty fast for me, to update all to IIB, and they 'scrubbed' all the account, so no lates showing. TU, not so much, I'm on round 3 with 6 accounts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also found Equifax updated a few at a time. I would get a notice, then find some accounts still pending. If it's been at least 30 days since the start of your dispute, do it again. You may have to send letter to Comenity.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Countingpennies</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-10T14:55:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Trade line issue help needed</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2048849#M11963</link>
      <description>I just got back my first disputes after discharge from equifax and all but one look good.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The one in question is a WFNNB/VICTORIAS SECRET card. This account WAS iib and I habe the petition paperwork to prove it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Equifax reported the creditor verified the trade line is correct HOWEVER it shows transferred/sold and the creditor now shows COMMENITY BANK/VICTORIAS SECRET but the account number is identical. They also did not update it to iib.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This can't be right if it was iib correct? How do i follow up on this to get resolved.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:53:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2048849#M11963</guid>
      <dc:creator>reno55</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T13:53:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trade line issue help needed</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2049113#M11964</link>
      <description>Equifax was pretty fast for me, to update all to IIB, and they 'scrubbed' all the account, so no lates showing. TU, not so much, I'm on round 3 with 6 accounts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also found Equifax updated a few at a time. I would get a notice, then find some accounts still pending. If it's been at least 30 days since the start of your dispute, do it again. You may have to send letter to Comenity.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:55:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2049113#M11964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Countingpennies</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-10T14:55:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Trade line issue help needed</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2051837#M11977</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/90018"&gt;@reno55&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I just got back my first disputes after discharge from equifax and all but one look good.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The one in question is a WFNNB/VICTORIAS SECRET card. This account WAS iib and I habe the petition paperwork to prove it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Equifax reported the creditor verified the trade line is correct HOWEVER it shows transferred/sold and the creditor now shows COMMENITY BANK/VICTORIAS SECRET but the account number is identical. They also did not update it to iib.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This can't be right if it was iib correct? How do i follow up on this to get resolved.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Send the OC a direct dispute under FCRA 623(a)(8).&amp;nbsp; They have to investigate and correct errors and notify you of the results within 30 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sample format, mailed directly to the party who reported the disputed information:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;“This is a Notice of Direct Dispute with you, under the provisions of FCRA §623(a)(8)(D), of the accuracy of information you have reported to my credit file.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ►&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (If sent to a debt collector, (CA),it might be beneficial to also include the blurb:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ►&amp;nbsp; “This is a direct dispute of credit reporting. This is not a request for debt validation/verification under FDCPA §809(b).”. (don’t let them just simply sluff it off as a meaningless&amp;nbsp; DV letter)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;“In compliance with FCRA §623(a)(8)(D), and enacting regulations published at&amp;nbsp; 16 CFR § 660.4, this Notice of Direct dispute includes:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;“Identification of the specific information being disputed:&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;(specify the account number, and the specific information that is disputed under that identifying account)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;“Basis for the dispute:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; (how the reporting was inaccurate; was any reporting in violation of any statutory or regulatory provisions?&amp;nbsp; account or express agreements?&amp;nbsp; CRA reporting gudelines? Account not&lt;BR /&gt;yours? etc.)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;“Supporting documentation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;all documents that support your dispute; it is recommened to also include, as part of your documentation, at least a copy of the portion only of your recent credit report showing their reporting of the disputed information was actually reported to your credit flle.&amp;nbsp; The implementing rule suggests a showing&lt;BR /&gt;that it appeared in your credit report)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 03:49:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Trade-line-issue-help-needed/m-p/2051837#M11977</guid>
      <dc:creator>DaBears</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-11T03:49:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

