<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Credit  reporting status as ch 13 instead of a 7 in Bankruptcy</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1177481#M8419</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/461154"&gt;@jenrhi&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I filed a chapt 13 but was denied, so i refiled a 7 and it was discharged in Sept 2008. Some of the creditors have notated it as a &lt;A target="_self" href="#"&gt;chapter 13&lt;/A&gt; on my cbr. Is this something i should dispute since technically it was discharged as a 7? Would it make any difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi jenrhi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take it that the BK itself is reporting correctly as a CH 7? &amp;nbsp;Then the BK will age off in ten years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The accounts are diffferent. &amp;nbsp;The negative notation of IIB (Included in Bankruptcy) or other similar notes should stay on for seven years, no matter what type of BK it was. &amp;nbsp;The accounts themselves will report for ten years. &amp;nbsp;That means they will report for three years as clean reports - without that IIB (or similar) notation attached to them. &amp;nbsp;Bonus!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure that it matters in any way that the accounts have noted they were included in a CH 13 rather than a CH 7. &amp;nbsp;For me, I would dispute the inaccurate reporting. &amp;nbsp;But I wouldn't fret if it were not corrected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that's somewhat helpful!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-01-23T00:44:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Credit  reporting status as ch 13 instead of a 7</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1175605#M8417</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I filed a chapt 13 but was denied, so i refiled a 7 and it was discharged in Sept 2008. Some of the creditors have notated it as a &lt;A target="_self" href="#"&gt;chapter 13&lt;/A&gt; on my cbr. Is this something i should dispute since technically it was discharged as a 7? Would it make any difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:43:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1175605#M8417</guid>
      <dc:creator>jenrhi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-22T03:43:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CBR is reporting some items as chap 13...</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1175107#M8418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, the type of discharge can effect the CR exclusion period used by the CRAs.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1175107#M8418</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertEG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-22T00:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Credit  reporting status as ch 13 instead of a 7</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1177481#M8419</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/461154"&gt;@jenrhi&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body"&gt;&lt;DIV class="lia-message-body-content"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I filed a chapt 13 but was denied, so i refiled a 7 and it was discharged in Sept 2008. Some of the creditors have notated it as a &lt;A target="_self" href="#"&gt;chapter 13&lt;/A&gt; on my cbr. Is this something i should dispute since technically it was discharged as a 7? Would it make any difference?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi jenrhi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take it that the BK itself is reporting correctly as a CH 7? &amp;nbsp;Then the BK will age off in ten years.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The accounts are diffferent. &amp;nbsp;The negative notation of IIB (Included in Bankruptcy) or other similar notes should stay on for seven years, no matter what type of BK it was. &amp;nbsp;The accounts themselves will report for ten years. &amp;nbsp;That means they will report for three years as clean reports - without that IIB (or similar) notation attached to them. &amp;nbsp;Bonus!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not sure that it matters in any way that the accounts have noted they were included in a CH 13 rather than a CH 7. &amp;nbsp;For me, I would dispute the inaccurate reporting. &amp;nbsp;But I wouldn't fret if it were not corrected.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that's somewhat helpful!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Bankruptcy/Credit-reporting-status-as-ch-13-instead-of-a-7/m-p/1177481#M8419</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-23T00:44:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

