<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card in Credit Cards</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6612046#M1833162</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/875377"&gt;@SouthJamaica&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I wonder if I should've apped to 'get in' with Barclays, if I was approved even with a toy limit, would I have had better chance this time apping for Hawaiian? Something to think about, or is my file to young/thin anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, in my experience Barclays doesn't work that way. They hold it against you, inquiry-wise, that you recently applied for a new card, even if it's one of theirs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO they are a very creepy outfit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, maybe I should've apped for Hawaiian first, then WF Bilt, but thought Bilt was trickier with an EX pull, so had no choice there. Frankly thought I had better odds with Barclays since it pulled TU, which has FAR fewer inquiries&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileylol" class="emoticon emoticon-smileylol" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-lol.gif" alt="Smiley LOL" title="Smiley LOL" /&gt; Oh well, not gonna app for Barclays any time soon I guess...the one denial among 5 apps this past 1.5 weeks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 23:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-11-05T23:36:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6564701#M1821904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Received mailer, it says prequalified and signing bonus is different than the webpage, Earner Visa sig is 30k pts for 1k spend/90days, whereas mine is 7.5k pts for 500/90 days.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Otherwise same rewards structure including no FTF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And APR is fixed, a horrendous 30.74% lol.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've stayed on Wyndham properties and aside from hotel stays, best use will be 5x pts for gas(2x for dining and grocery).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably not gonna apply for it but curious, my first Barclays mailer and I apped for AA Aviator Red in January(for the easiest miles earn lol) and was declined.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Heard they pull TU and my sig is current, although Disco website says only 2 HPs, weird. Those were mostly CO ones, and Barclays did pull in January. That month was the last HP for TU methinks, for CO SO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts? I've browsed Wyndham/Barclay posts here and some got toy SLs lol. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 06:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6564701#M1821904</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-14T06:19:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6564721#M1821910</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BarclayUS is mostly known for being a TU puller but it can vary, in part depending on which state you live in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would consider it a small win that BarclayUS would send you a targeted prequalifier as they have a track record of being pretty legit but with that watered down SUB and high APR I would suggest you pass on this one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:10:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6564721#M1821910</guid>
      <dc:creator>coldfusion</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-14T10:10:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6611841#M1833111</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Now I wonder if I should've apped to 'get in' with Barclays, if I was approved even with a toy limit, would I have had better chance this time apping for Hawaiian? Something to think about, or is my file too young/thin anyway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 23:33:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6611841#M1833111</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-05T23:33:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6611880#M1833114</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I wonder if I should've apped to 'get in' with Barclays, if I was approved even with a toy limit, would I have had better chance this time apping for Hawaiian? Something to think about, or is my file to young/thin anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, in my experience Barclays doesn't work that way. They hold it against you, inquiry-wise, that you recently applied for a new card, even if it's one of theirs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO they are a very creepy outfit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 13:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6611880#M1833114</guid>
      <dc:creator>SouthJamaica</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-05T13:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wyndham Rewards Earner 'Access' card</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6612046#M1833162</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/875377"&gt;@SouthJamaica&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I wonder if I should've apped to 'get in' with Barclays, if I was approved even with a toy limit, would I have had better chance this time apping for Hawaiian? Something to think about, or is my file to young/thin anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, in my experience Barclays doesn't work that way. They hold it against you, inquiry-wise, that you recently applied for a new card, even if it's one of theirs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IMHO they are a very creepy outfit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, maybe I should've apped for Hawaiian first, then WF Bilt, but thought Bilt was trickier with an EX pull, so had no choice there. Frankly thought I had better odds with Barclays since it pulled TU, which has FAR fewer inquiries&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileylol" class="emoticon emoticon-smileylol" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-lol.gif" alt="Smiley LOL" title="Smiley LOL" /&gt; Oh well, not gonna app for Barclays any time soon I guess...the one denial among 5 apps this past 1.5 weeks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2022 23:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Credit-Cards/Wyndham-Rewards-Earner-Access-card/m-p/6612046#M1833162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-11-05T23:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

