<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization? in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397589#M146102</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not that I care about VS 3.0 scores at all, but I found this interesting.&amp;nbsp; We all know that when it comes to FICO scoring, any reported balance on a single revolver even if it's just a few bucks constitutes revolving credit use and allows one to escape the no revolving credit use penalty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if with VS 3.0 there's some sort of minimum?&amp;nbsp; Allow me to explain what I saw with my file.&amp;nbsp; 2 CK updates ago on TU my score was 836 and that was with AZEO and a balance of a few thousand dollars on a high limit card (say 5% of the card limit, aggregate 1%).&amp;nbsp; On the next update, that card had reported $0 and a $3 balance reported on a different card.&amp;nbsp; So, I'm still at AZEO, except with a $3 reported balance.&amp;nbsp; -13 to the TU score, 823.&amp;nbsp; Today I saw that another card of mine reported balance on TU of around $100, +13 points back to 836.&amp;nbsp; It's worth noting that I'm at AZE2 now, but if the $3 balance is being "ignored" it could be seen as AZEO still I suppose.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts on this outside of the standard VS 3.0 scores dont matter and their algorithm is screwy anyway?&amp;nbsp; &lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-01T18:22:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397589#M146102</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not that I care about VS 3.0 scores at all, but I found this interesting.&amp;nbsp; We all know that when it comes to FICO scoring, any reported balance on a single revolver even if it's just a few bucks constitutes revolving credit use and allows one to escape the no revolving credit use penalty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if with VS 3.0 there's some sort of minimum?&amp;nbsp; Allow me to explain what I saw with my file.&amp;nbsp; 2 CK updates ago on TU my score was 836 and that was with AZEO and a balance of a few thousand dollars on a high limit card (say 5% of the card limit, aggregate 1%).&amp;nbsp; On the next update, that card had reported $0 and a $3 balance reported on a different card.&amp;nbsp; So, I'm still at AZEO, except with a $3 reported balance.&amp;nbsp; -13 to the TU score, 823.&amp;nbsp; Today I saw that another card of mine reported balance on TU of around $100, +13 points back to 836.&amp;nbsp; It's worth noting that I'm at AZE2 now, but if the $3 balance is being "ignored" it could be seen as AZEO still I suppose.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts on this outside of the standard VS 3.0 scores dont matter and their algorithm is screwy anyway?&amp;nbsp; &lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397589#M146102</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-01T18:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397609#M146103</link>
      <description>I'd be interested to find out. 😊</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 18:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397609#M146103</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-01T18:47:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397624#M146104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently my score changed with AZE2 and balance decreases. The new time line on CK named "See whats Changed" shows a history now and it goes back a long way. When it went back to AZEO. There was no change back. It stayed the same. YMMV.&amp;nbsp; First time I went AZE2 for 2 months straight with 7 cards at 1% util. Back in july same thing with only AZEO. The Discover was a transfer of my CL when I opened my 2cd card in June&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ck2.PNG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38119i08860B866FD07A7B/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ck2.PNG" alt="ck2.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ck.PNG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38120i262A6B027E20540C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ck.PNG" alt="ck.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="ck23.PNG" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/38121iE8D1E9DC8B9AFEC5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="ck23.PNG" alt="ck23.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 19:20:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5397624#M146104</guid>
      <dc:creator>FireMedic1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-01T19:20:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399150#M146208</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not that I care about VS 3.0 scores at all, but I found this interesting.&amp;nbsp; We all know that when it comes to FICO scoring, any reported balance on a single revolver even if it's just a few bucks constitutes revolving credit use and allows one to escape the no revolving credit use penalty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if with VS 3.0 there's some sort of minimum?&amp;nbsp; Allow me to explain what I saw with my file.&amp;nbsp; 2 CK updates ago on TU my score was 836 and that was with AZEO and a balance of a few thousand dollars on a high limit card (say 5% of the card limit, aggregate 1%).&amp;nbsp; On the next update, that card had reported $0 and a $3 balance reported on a different card.&amp;nbsp; So, I'm still at AZEO, except with a $3 reported balance.&amp;nbsp; -13 to the TU score, 823.&amp;nbsp; Today I saw that another card of mine reported balance on TU of around $100, +13 points back to 836.&amp;nbsp; It's worth noting that I'm at AZE2 now, but if the $3 balance is being "ignored" it could be seen as AZEO still I suppose.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts on this outside of the standard VS 3.0 scores dont matter and their algorithm is screwy anyway?&amp;nbsp; &lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.gif" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do know VantageScore is a bit unusual regarding utilization. Optimum utilization for score is in a narrow band between 4.5% and 4.9% as I recall. I provided the below graph previously from the VS simulator in CK. My real world scores behaved in a similar fashion. Earlier this year I looked UT% in 0.1% increments in the 3.5% to 5.5% range and its impact on VS3 score. I cant find the data but the peak score occurred in a narrow band (4.7% to 5.0% or thereabouts).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Although you don't like the simulator, I'd suggest adjusting your balance with all else being equal and look at the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="VS3 graph.jpg" style="width: 756px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28317i23AD4156DD7933D8/image-dimensions/756x562?v=v2" width="756" height="562" role="button" title="VS3 graph.jpg" alt="VS3 graph.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399150#M146208</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas_Thumb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-03T13:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399158#M146209</link>
      <description>Interesting question and replies. Confess until you raised the point, I had not inquired on VS 3.0. May be time to observe.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 13:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399158#M146209</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-03T13:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399247#M146211</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I reached my optimal score on VS3 with one card reporting at less than 1% of available credit for 8 cards.&amp;nbsp; I had high credit card debt in early 2016 and purposed to bring it $0.&amp;nbsp; When I finally joined MyFico I was down to $0 out of 73K+.&amp;nbsp; Then I let one account report for $148 and achieved my highest score - 832.&amp;nbsp; I had a MTG with 23% paid and an auto loan with 40% paid.&amp;nbsp; When I finally found the courage to report 2 cards (total $568) my VS3 dropped a few points but my FICO score was on the rise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For me (if there are also profiles with VS3) it doesn't like me reporting much more that $500 on 1 card.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 16:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399247#M146211</guid>
      <dc:creator>Trudy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-03T16:40:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does VS 3.0 model ignore very low utilization?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399653#M146228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting TT, good to know.&amp;nbsp; This was the first time I've ever observed a score drop from ultra low (but non-zero) reported utilization on VS 3.0, but I definitely don't monitor those scores much at all and for all I know have received the same score penalty in the past and just wasn't aware.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2018 04:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Does-VS-3-0-model-ignore-very-low-utilization/m-p/5399653#M146228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-04T04:02:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

