<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Discover Credit Scorecard 79% UTL good what? in Understanding FICO® Scoring</title>
    <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5779480#M161862</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you referring to creditscorecard.com (by Discover) or your scorecard accessed through your own Discover account?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't get hung up on the "good" or "very good" etc. arbitrary "ratings" provided by CMS fluff.&amp;nbsp; From reading on here I'm sure you know what is good and what is not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a fun aside, my utilization on the scorecard through the Discover site is 1% and assigned the fluff rating of "very good" where if I go to creditscorecard.com my fluff rating is "exceptional" with the same data and 1% utilization.&amp;nbsp; Both scorecards as many know appear to be nearly identical and of course by the same company, so these "ratings" can be inconsistent.&amp;nbsp; My credit score is identical through both sources, so clearly the different fluff rating doesn't matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;From&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;creditscorecard.com. Just seems silly they'd say this is good when it's actually bad.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-10-19T12:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Discover Credit Scorecard 79% UTL good what?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5778511#M161823</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I had to make another theread here today as I saw something stupid. According to the&amp;nbsp;Discover Credit Scorecard 79% usage is considered good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Excuse me what?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 16:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5778511#M161823</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-18T16:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Discover Credit Scorecard 79% UTL good what?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5778650#M161827</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you referring to creditscorecard.com (by Discover) or your scorecard accessed through your own Discover account?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't get hung up on the "good" or "very good" etc. arbitrary "ratings" provided by CMS fluff.&amp;nbsp; From reading on here I'm sure you know what is good and what is not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a fun aside, my utilization on the scorecard through the Discover site is 1% and assigned the fluff rating of "very good" where if I go to creditscorecard.com my fluff rating is "exceptional" with the same data and 1% utilization.&amp;nbsp; Both scorecards as many know appear to be nearly identical and of course by the same company, so these "ratings" can be inconsistent.&amp;nbsp; My credit score is identical through both sources, so clearly the different fluff rating doesn't matter.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5778650#M161827</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-18T18:26:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Discover Credit Scorecard 79% UTL good what?</title>
      <link>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5779480#M161862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you referring to creditscorecard.com (by Discover) or your scorecard accessed through your own Discover account?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Don't get hung up on the "good" or "very good" etc. arbitrary "ratings" provided by CMS fluff.&amp;nbsp; From reading on here I'm sure you know what is good and what is not.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a fun aside, my utilization on the scorecard through the Discover site is 1% and assigned the fluff rating of "very good" where if I go to creditscorecard.com my fluff rating is "exceptional" with the same data and 1% utilization.&amp;nbsp; Both scorecards as many know appear to be nearly identical and of course by the same company, so these "ratings" can be inconsistent.&amp;nbsp; My credit score is identical through both sources, so clearly the different fluff rating doesn't matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;From&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;creditscorecard.com. Just seems silly they'd say this is good when it's actually bad.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 12:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ficoforums.myfico.com/t5/Understanding-FICO-Scoring/Discover-Credit-Scorecard-79-UTL-good-what/m-p/5779480#M161862</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-10-19T12:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

